[CWG-Stewardship] [CWG-RFP3] CCWG California Law Response

[Jordan Carter]

Assuming this is directed to me:

WP1 is kicking off, and is working through an inventory of suggestions made
by participants in a range of consultations. All the options the community
has suggested over the past few months are being assessed.

What comes out in terms of recommendations will indeed be a consensus of
the CCWG. I am just highlighting that this issue is one of those under way.

I apologise if anyone finds this content irrelevant and unhelpful to the
CWG.

best
Jordan


On 10 February 2015 at 10:12, Gary Campbell <gcampbell at mstem.gov.jm> wrote:

>  John,
>
> Are you doing this unilaterally or is it a consensus position of the
> working group?
>
> Gary
>
>
>
> *From:* cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org [mailto:
> cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org] *On Behalf Of *Jordan Carter
> *Sent:* Monday, February 09, 2015 8:57 PM
> *To:* Steve Crocker
> *Cc:* Kieren McCarthy; cwg-stewardship at icann.org; RFP3
> *Subject:* Re: [CWG-Stewardship] [CWG-RFP3] CCWG California Law Response
>
>
>
> For the information of CWG members, Working Party 1 of the Accountability
> CCWG (dealing with community empowerment) will be considering the removal
> both of individual board members and of the entire Board as part of its
> work.
>
>
>
> JTC
>
>
>
>
>
> On 10 February 2015 at 09:50, Steve Crocker <steve.crocker at icann.org>
> wrote:
>
> Kieren,
>
>
>
> On Feb 10, 2015, at 9:37 AM, Kieren McCarthy <kierenmccarthy at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>
>
>  It should also be possible to get rid of smaller numbers of board
> members seeing as most are supposed to be representative of a particular
> community.
>
>
>
> This is exactly wrong.  Board members are obligated to do what's best for
> the entire community, not just their particular consistency.  They bring
> the perspective of their constituency as part of their background and
> knowledge, but they are not supposed to be the representative of their
> constituency in the sense of a congress or parliament.
>
>
>
> You might argue we should change the role of the Board or create a
> different body, but the idea that specific Board members are responsible
> the outcome relevant to their body is contrary to the actual obligation
> currently in force.
>
>
>
> Steve
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CWG-Stewardship mailing list
> CWG-Stewardship at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Jordan Carter
>
> Chief Executive
> *InternetNZ*
>
> 04 495 2118 (office) | +64 21 442 649 (mob)
> jordan at internetnz.net.nz
> Skype: jordancarter
>
> *To promote the Internet's benefits and uses, and protect its potential.*
>   NOTICE OF CONFIDENTIALITY This communication including any information
> transmitted with it is intended only for the use of the addressees and is
> confidential. If you are not an intended recipient or responsible for
> delivering the message to an intended recipient, any review, disclosure,
> conversion to hard copy, dissemination, reproduction or other use of any
> part of this communication is strictly prohibited, as is the taking or
> omitting of any action in reliance upon this communication. If you receive
> this communication in error or without authorization please notify us
> immediately by return e-mail or otherwise and permanently delete the entire
> communication from any computer, disk drive, or other storage medium.
>



-- 
Jordan Carter

Chief Executive
*InternetNZ*

04 495 2118 (office) | +64 21 442 649 (mob)
jordan at internetnz.net.nz
Skype: jordancarter

*To promote the Internet's benefits and uses, and protect its potential.*
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20150210/539c8dda/attachment.html>