[CWG-Stewardship] Update on the Integrated model.

[Avri Doria]

prematurely sent.  needed to remove the dangling Finally and sign it.

avri


On 20-Feb-15 18:18, Avri Doria wrote:
>
> On 20-Feb-15 16:50, Milton L Mueller wrote:
>>
>> My question:
>>
>>  
>>
>> Does this model provide for separability?
>>
>>  
>>
>
> First it provides structural separation in all configurations.  That
> is a first level of severability and hopefully as much as really is
> ever needed.  Additionally, in this model, ICANN would have the same
> ability to pick another provider, or perhaps a redundant provider,
> just as the names or protocols can now.  This is made possible by
> virtue of structural  separation and the defintion of SLA/MOUs across
> a corporate boundary.
>
> Further levels of separability can, however, be obtained in the Shared
> Service Arrangement configuration or the finally in the Free Standing
> configuration.
>
> Finally
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CWG-Stewardship mailing list
> CWG-Stewardship at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20150220/c9803776/attachment.html>