[CWG-Stewardship] ICANN Board as "regulator" (was: A liaison from the Board to CWG)

[Andrew Sullivan]

On Sat, Feb 21, 2015 at 02:24:23PM +0000, Milton L Mueller wrote:
> > That is indeed an important issue, but I'm not sure it is directly related to
> > the IANA transition as such.
> 
> Sigh. It is related because in all other operational communities, the policy making function is separated from the IANA function. In DNS it is not.

Perhaps I should have stated explicitly, "…given that there's in fact
a whole other WG working on the accountability issues."  This is why I
argued the other day that we need to work out the necessary and
sufficient conditions for accountability but do no more.

Best regards,

A

-- 
Andrew Sullivan
ajs at anvilwalrusden.com