[CWG-Stewardship] A liaison from the Board to CWG

Seun Ojedeji seun.ojedeji at gmail.com
Sat Feb 21 17:47:31 UTC 2015


Hi,

Perhaps it's good to note that what ICANN does in gTLD land is normal
organisation operation that is done at most cctld and also at every RIR as
I will liken gTLD to a typical RIR/CCs in this context. So regulating in
that sense may be normal although "coordinating" is what I prefer as a
choice of word.

Whatever word we use in describing ICANN's role may not matter much. What
may be important is to determine how much of those activities has
significant community process embedded in it; which is largely in the CCWG
scope to ensure.

Cheers!
sent from Google nexus 4
kindly excuse brevity and typos.
On 20 Feb 2015 22:49, "Milton L Mueller" <mueller at syr.edu> wrote:

>  Martin, in ccTLD land ICANN may not look like a regulator but in gTLD
> land here is what it does:
>
> ·        impose dispute resolution rules on every gTLD registrant in the
> world
>
> ·        decides on the supply of a resource (TLDs),
>
> ·        accredits registrars,
>
> ·        fixes or has the ability to fix the price for registries’
> wholesale prices
>
> ·        establishes requirements, terms and conditions for the
> registry-registrar relationship
>
> ·        requires the use of certain technologies (e.g., DNSSEC)
>
> I could go on…
>
> Regulators can run things but whether they do or not, ICANN is a
> regulator/policy maker.
>
>
>
> *From:* cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org [mailto:
> cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org] *On Behalf Of *Martin Boyle
> *Sent:* Friday, February 20, 2015 1:45 PM
> *To:* Christopher Wilkinson; cwg-stewardship at icann.org Stewardship
> *Subject:* Re: [CWG-Stewardship] A liaison from the Board to CWG
>
>
>
> Definitely +1 to this idea, Lise.
>
>
>
> And in response to Christopher, I heard Strickling refer to ICANN as one
> of the stakeholders.  I’m not sure about ICANN as regulator and IANA
> functions operator – regulators don’t really run stuff, do they?  It might
> be a regulator for the gTLD (registry and registrar) operations, but I’d
> like to understand why you’d think that this also applied to the IANA
> functions operation.
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
> Martin
>
>
>
> *From:* cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org [
> mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org
> <cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org>] *On Behalf Of *Christopher Wilkinson
> *Sent:* 20 February 2015 15:17
> *To:* cwg-stewardship at icann.org Stewardship
> *Subject:* Re: [CWG-Stewardship] A liaison from the Board to CWG
>
>
>
> Okay, +1         CW
>
>
>
> PS:        However, I do not see the ICANN Board as a 'stakeholder' in
> its own right.
>
>             Rather, the ICANN Board is the Regulator holding the Ring
> among all the Stakeholders.
>
>
>
>             That is why the composition of the Board, the way it is
> appointed and its accountability to the Community, including Governments,
> is so important, going forward.
>
>
>
> On 20 Feb 2015, at 12:15, Seun Ojedeji <seun.ojedeji at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> Hi Lise,
>
> This is a welcome idea and i am in support of it.
>
> Thanks for providing prior notice
>
> Cheers!
>
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 11:58 AM, Lise Fuhr <lise.fuhr at difo.dk> wrote:
>
> Dear All,
>
>
>
> During the meeting in Singapore the co-chairs have picked up that ICANN
> Board is an important stakeholder for this groups as well. We have noticed
> that there have been involvement from the Board in the CWG work during
> calls and during the actual meetings in Singapore. Because of this
> involvement, the fact that the board is a stakeholder and in order to
> ensure a continuously and open dialogue with the CWG, we find that having a
> liaison from the board could be helpful. Not that the liaison will have a
> special status within the group but serve as a link between the CWG  and
> the ICANN board, in line with how the CCWG has a liaison from ICANN Board.
>
>
>
> Jonathan and I intend to approach the board regarding this in the
> beginning of next week.
>
>
>
> Best regards,
>
> Jonathan and Lise
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CWG-Stewardship mailing list
> CWG-Stewardship at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
> *Seun Ojedeji, Federal University Oye-Ekiti web:      *
> *http://www.fuoye.edu.ng <http://www.fuoye.edu.ng/> **Mobile:
> +2348035233535 <%2B2348035233535>*
> *alt email: <http://goog_1872880453/>seun.ojedeji at fuoye.edu.ng
> <seun.ojedeji at fuoye.edu.ng>*
>
> The key to understanding is humility - my view !
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CWG-Stewardship mailing list
> CWG-Stewardship at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CWG-Stewardship mailing list
> CWG-Stewardship at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20150221/303a7e1c/attachment.html>


More information about the CWG-Stewardship mailing list