[CWG-Stewardship] Update on the Integrated model.

Avri Doria avri at acm.org
Mon Feb 23 04:02:22 UTC 2015

On 22-Feb-15 19:03, Milton L Mueller wrote:
>> > Moreover, the proposal
>> > seems to work from the assumption that the IETF's ability to leave and go
>> > elsewhere is a thing to be "mitigated", but the IETF appears to like that
>> > arrangement.
> I agree with you here, this is why I asked Avri about the separability issue. 

While I personally hate the idea of splitting IANA, and think it is a
disastrous thing to do, it remains possible in this model as was
foreordained by the ICG.

I do hope the Integrated model* helps make that less likely.  but if any
of the 3 operational communities wants to leave, they could.


* and it is not mine though I am representing it, at least over the
weekend - i am one of three authors

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20150222/03228f85/attachment.html>

More information about the CWG-Stewardship mailing list