[CWG-Stewardship] Update on the Integrated model.
avri at acm.org
Mon Feb 23 04:02:22 UTC 2015
On 22-Feb-15 19:03, Milton L Mueller wrote:
>> > Moreover, the proposal
>> > seems to work from the assumption that the IETF's ability to leave and go
>> > elsewhere is a thing to be "mitigated", but the IETF appears to like that
>> > arrangement.
> I agree with you here, this is why I asked Avri about the separability issue.
While I personally hate the idea of splitting IANA, and think it is a
disastrous thing to do, it remains possible in this model as was
foreordained by the ICG.
I do hope the Integrated model* helps make that less likely. but if any
of the 3 operational communities wants to leave, they could.
* and it is not mine though I am representing it, at least over the
weekend - i am one of three authors
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the CWG-Stewardship