[CWG-Stewardship] CWG - Design team proposals - competition and conflict of interest

[CW Lists]

Good morning:

(a) most of what CWG is dealing with has 'policy' implications.

(b) the GNSO track record on competition and conflict of interest is not convincing.

Regards

CW

PS:	 The author of the 'detailed description' (who?) appears to have encapsulated the issue quite clearly.


On 25 Feb 2015, at 01:10, "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes at verisign.com> wrote:

> Looks like a policy issue to me Christopher, moreover a GNSO policy issue.
>  
> Chuck
>  
> From: cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org [mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Christopher Wilkinson
> Sent: Monday, February 23, 2015 1:37 PM
> To: cwg-stewardship at icann.org Stewardship; Bernard Turcotte
> Subject: Re: [CWG-Stewardship] CWG - Design team proposals - competition and conflict of interest
>  
> Good evening:
>  
> Please find attached a proposal for a Design Team to address conflicts of interest and competition/anti.-trust aspects of the IANA transition.
> Thankyou for a very relevant "Detailed Description" of this group, already supplied.
>  
> Regards
>  
> CW
>  
>  
>  
> On 20 Feb 2015, at 19:32, Bernard Turcotte <turcotte.bernard at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> All,
>  
> A reminder that we are looking forward to receiving your suggestions for Design Teams to address specific issues for the CWG Transition proposal.
>  
> Please forward your suggestions to the list as soon as possible.
>  
> Bernard (for Lise).
>  
>  
> _______________________________________________
> CWG-Stewardship mailing list
> CWG-Stewardship at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20150225/948e0c0a/attachment.html>