[CWG-Stewardship] ICANN Board as "regulator" (was: A liaison from the Board to CWG)

[CW Lists]

+1

CW


On 26 Feb 2015, at 20:33, manning bill <bmanning at isi.edu> wrote:

> One might actually ask the parties registered under .INT as to what they would like to see.  I’m sure they a) are fully invested in the outcome, and
> b)  might actually have opinions that matter.   I can not see why the IETF or the RIRs should have a say in the matter.
> 
> 
> /bill
> PO Box 12317
> Marina del Rey, CA 90295
> 310.322.8102
> 
> On 26February2015Thursday, at 11:20, Robert Guerra <rguerra at privaterra.org> wrote:
>