[CWG-Stewardship] Alternate configuration for Integrated model

[Avri Doria]

Hi,

After the discussion on Tuesday we, the AdHoc Team (AHT), started
thinking about how to react to the admonition against presuming any sort
of acceptance by the Protocol and Names communities in the model.

https://docs.google.com/document/d/14mK5jum6NqhELcGJHntcH9NoZBEk6_tuTWUof3yr9bk/edit?usp=sharing

This briefly describes one possible configuration with which the
Integrated model could be achieved by using a opt-in Membership based
Shared Services Arrangement. (MSSA). 

This is still an early draft and open for comments.

Additonally, while presenting the model and various configurations to a
NCSG webinar today, there was a recommendation that we produce process
diagrams similar to those produced for the first Frankfurt meeting.  We
will start working on that over the next days.  Once there is a basic
document it will be shared for comment in the same way the rest of the
documents in the model have been.

Also presented the Integrated model to the At-large Working Group on
IANA Stewardship and Accountabity.  Various capture scenarios were
discussed in that meeting that would need to be covered in any stress
tests for solutions models.  Will work on a document discussing some of
the various capture threats and how they are dealt with in the
Integrated model.

thanks
avri
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20150227/f54437ae/attachment.html>