[CWG-Stewardship] Service Level Expectations Design Team Template

Avri Doria avri at acm.org
Sat Feb 28 23:56:04 UTC 2015


Hi,

Makes sense to me.

avri

On 28-Feb-15 18:43, Chris Disspain wrote:
> On that basis I wonder whether we would not be better served by 
> accepting the current status quo and building a mechanism for review 
> and negotiated changes to those service levels that could be employed 
> immediately after transition and on an ongoing basis.
>
> Thoughts?



---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
http://www.avast.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20150228/d27f07f5/attachment.html>


More information about the CWG-Stewardship mailing list