[CWG-Stewardship] CWG - Public Consultation Statistical Analysis V2.0

[Seun Ojedeji]

Hi Bernard,

Thanks for this very useful analysis and i must also note that its quite
different from what Milton earlier shared.

Regards

On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 8:27 PM, Bernard Turcotte <turcotte.bernard at gmail.com
> wrote:

> All (at the request of the co-Chairs),
>
> Please find attached  the next version (2.0) of the analysis (based on the
> previous spreadsheet which was presented on December 30th).
>
> All the data used is included as well as how it was classified etc. and
> the various tabs are aptly named.
>
> Tabulation of results has now been automated to avoid errors.
>
> There are no significant differences vs the results presented December
> 30th:
>
>
>    - The analysis of all the responses together is essentially the same
>    and still does not give a majority to Contract Co.(when using a 75%
>    requirement)
>    - The analysis by type of respondent is useful but the cross
>    comparisons are not, at least in my opinion.
>    - The analysis of ccTLDs vs the RySG proposal in interesting.
>    - The analysis of In ICANN vs Not In ICANN is very interesting with a
>    high degree of correlation on many points by those In ICANN.
>
> Attached.
>
> B.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CWG-Stewardship mailing list
> CWG-Stewardship at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
>
>


-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------------





*Seun Ojedeji,Federal University Oye-Ekitiweb:      http://www.fuoye.edu.ng
<http://www.fuoye.edu.ng> Mobile: +2348035233535**alt email:
<http://goog_1872880453>seun.ojedeji at fuoye.edu.ng
<seun.ojedeji at fuoye.edu.ng>*

The key to understanding is humility - my view !
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20150108/38b67663/attachment.html>