[CWG-Stewardship] Survey Links - for your convenience

[Robert Guerra]

Just checked the Contract Co/IAP survey.  The first  bank of questions indeed has “Completely agree” instead of “strongly agree”, the rest however are the same as the previous survey.

The error was an oversight on my part, apologies. 

I’ve revised the form, which should now read “Completely agree”

regards

Robert



> On Jan 8, 2015, at 3:00 PM, Greg Shatan <gregshatanipc at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> They should not have changed. You should read it as "Strongly Agree." We should change this in the survey.
> 
> On Thursday, January 8, 2015, Gomes, Chuck <cgomes at verisign.com <mailto:cgomes at verisign.com>> wrote:
> I didn’t even notice the change but my understanding was that the choices would stay the same as in the first survey.
> 
>  
> 
> Chuck
> 
>  
> 
> From: cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org');> [mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org');>] On Behalf Of Avri Doria
> Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2015 2:30 PM
> To: cwg-stewardship at icann.org <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','cwg-stewardship at icann.org');>
> Subject: Re: [CWG-Stewardship] Survey Links - for your convenience
> 
>  
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Thanks to both you and Robert.
> 
> Started doing S2.
> 
> Did we have a reason for switching from Strongly Agree to Completely Agree.
> And why did we do that?
> And do we really mean completely?!
> 
> I know as a member I am not answering for myself but for a group, but i can't imagine many things in this world that either I or the NCSG agrees with completely.  
> When you add ambiguity to the questions and the answers, it becomes even more unlikely.
> 
> avri
> 
> On 08-Jan-15 12:44, Greg Shatan wrote:
> 
> Here is an MS Word copy.  Checking if there is a PDF copy to be had.
> 
>  
> 
> Greg
> 
>  
> 
> On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 12:26 PM, Avri Doria <avri at acm.org <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','avri at acm.org');>> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> And is there a pdf copy of survey 2 for consultation no matter how brief they might be?
> 
> thanks
> & apologies if i missed it
> 
> avri
> 
> On 08-Jan-15 07:37, Greg Shatan wrote:
> 
>  
> 
> Just in case you might have difficulty locating the two links, so that you can use this "free hour" :-)<image001.gif> productively, I supply them here:
> 
> 
> Survey #1: http://goo.gl/forms/q29h3d29he <http://goo.gl/forms/q29h3d29he>
> Survey #2: http://goo.gl/forms/N8smhdeUk8 <http://goo.gl/forms/N8smhdeUk8>
> Greg
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> CWG-Stewardship mailing list
> CWG-Stewardship at icann.org <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','CWG-Stewardship at icann.org');>
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship <https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship>
>  
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> CWG-Stewardship mailing list
> CWG-Stewardship at icann.org <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','CWG-Stewardship at icann.org');>
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship <https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship>
>  
> 
>  
> 
> _______________________________________________
> CWG-Stewardship mailing list
> CWG-Stewardship at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20150108/8bc5357d/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 2841 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20150108/8bc5357d/smime-0001.p7s>