[CWG-Stewardship] RFP 3 Sub-Group (AKA RFP 3b) - CALL FOR VOLUNTEERS

Milton L Mueller mueller at syr.edu
Fri Jan 9 22:48:48 UTC 2015

I hope this is a joke, because it is not workable. Seriously. People who want an internal solution should do their best to develop a workable and detailed internal solution. People who want an external solution should refine and improve the Frankfurt proposal based on the public comments and the surveys. We CANNOT do both at the same time; you have people working at cross purposes to each other. The whole point of having a separate track is to eliminate the cross-talk and interference among people working on different projects. There must be separate lists for this.

From: Greg Shatan [mailto:gregshatanipc at gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, January 9, 2015 12:45 PM
To: Alan Greenberg
Cc: Milton L Mueller; jrobinson at afilias.info; cwg-stewardship at icann.org
Subject: Re: [CWG-Stewardship] RFP 3 Sub-Group (AKA RFP 3b) - CALL FOR VOLUNTEERS

Quite the opposite! It means you get to work on two tracks at the same time!!

On Friday, January 9, 2015, Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca<mailto:alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca>> wrote:
Does that mean I actually get the weekend off?  Alan

At 09/01/2015 09:50 AM, Milton L Mueller wrote:

One of the advantages of a subgroup devoted to an internal solution is that work on the mainstream proposal (an external solution, which enjoyed the most support in the public comment period) can proceed more expeditiously. Therefore I would like to know the agenda for the two calls tomorrow. My understanding is that those calls should be devoted to improving and revising the external proposal based on the survey results.

I think when this “intensive work weekend” was originally scheduled, we assumed that the CWG would be finalizing its proposal and would need that much time to iron out the differences in a way that had consensus. It is clear that we are not there yet, so I would hope that this time would be productively used to improve the mainstream proposal while the subgroup simultaneously develops an alternative internal proposal.


From: cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org');> [ mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org');>] On Behalf Of Jonathan Robinson
Sent: Thursday, January 8, 2015 11:43 AM
To: cwg-stewardship at icann.org<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','cwg-stewardship at icann.org');>
Subject: [CWG-Stewardship] RFP 3 Sub-Group (AKA RFP 3b) - CALL FOR VOLUNTEERS
Importance: High



Please note this urgent call for volunteers for a sub-group of RFP3.

The sub-group is  required to work together to further develop a variant proposal for the CWG which takes account of proposals and comments received by the CWG, particularly as they relate to a so-called “internal to ICANN” option or variant to the original draft proposal of the CWG.

Allan Mc Gillivray has offered to assist with co-ordination of the group and it will need a committed team to work with Allan in short order to make the requisite progress.


CWG Co-chair

CWG-Stewardship mailing list
CWG-Stewardship at icann.org<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','CWG-Stewardship at icann.org');>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20150109/91e12a46/attachment.html>

More information about the CWG-Stewardship mailing list