[CWG-Stewardship] RFP 3 Sub-Group (AKA RFP 3b) - CALL FOR VOLUNTEERS

[Greg Shatan]

My only intent is ministerial.  I am not trying to create any sense of
segregation, nor do I believe I havve.  If others are, you can take it up
with them, but don't attribute it to me.

Greg

On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 3:44 AM, Milton L Mueller <mueller at syr.edu> wrote:

>  Seun,
>
> I am simply talking about a division of LABOR which is a well-known way to
> improve the efficiency of work. Even if the two tracks contain all the same
> people, it is less confusing and more focused to separate communications
> about the two tasks, just as we separated RFP3 and 4 and 5 lists
>
>
>
> *From:* Seun Ojedeji [mailto:seun.ojedeji at gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Friday, January 9, 2015 11:40 PM
> *To:* Milton L Mueller
> *Cc:* Greg Shatan; Alan Greenberg; cwg-stewardship at icann.org
>
> *Subject:* Re: [CWG-Stewardship] RFP 3 Sub-Group (AKA RFP 3b) - CALL FOR
> VOLUNTEERS
>
>
>
> Hi Milton,
>
> Its unfortunate the sense of division that is being created here and i
> hope the Chair and VCs will be sensitive to this; we all worked on the cwg
> proposal in Frankfurt so i expect a level of open mind from all members of
> this WG whenever other options are proposed (even if we have preferences)
> but again i am sure those who have following may have already sense this
> coming a long time ago.
>
> Regards
>
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 11:48 PM, Milton L Mueller <mueller at syr.edu> wrote:
>
>  I hope this is a joke, because it is not workable. Seriously. People who
> want an internal solution should do their best to develop a workable and
> detailed internal solution. People who want an external solution should
> refine and improve the Frankfurt proposal based on the public comments and
> the surveys. We CANNOT do both at the same time; you have people working at
> cross purposes to each other. The whole point of having a separate track is
> to eliminate the cross-talk and interference among people working on
> different projects. There must be separate lists for this.
>
>
>
> *From:* Greg Shatan [mailto:gregshatanipc at gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Friday, January 9, 2015 12:45 PM
> *To:* Alan Greenberg
> *Cc:* Milton L Mueller; jrobinson at afilias.info; cwg-stewardship at icann.org
> *Subject:* Re: [CWG-Stewardship] RFP 3 Sub-Group (AKA RFP 3b) - CALL FOR
> VOLUNTEERS
>
>
>
> Quite the opposite! It means you get to work on two tracks at the same
> time!!
>
> On Friday, January 9, 2015, Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca>
> wrote:
>
>  Does that mean I actually get the weekend off?  Alan
>
> At 09/01/2015 09:50 AM, Milton L Mueller wrote:
>
>  Jonathan
> One of the advantages of a subgroup devoted to an internal solution is
> that work on the mainstream proposal (an external solution, which enjoyed
> the most support in the public comment period) can proceed more
> expeditiously. Therefore I would like to know the agenda for the two calls
> tomorrow. My understanding is that those calls should be devoted to
> improving and revising the external proposal based on the survey results.
>
> I think when this “intensive work weekend” was originally scheduled, we
> assumed that the CWG would be finalizing its proposal and would need that
> much time to iron out the differences in a way that had consensus. It is
> clear that we are not there yet, so I would hope that this time would be
> productively used to improve the mainstream proposal while the subgroup
> simultaneously develops an alternative internal proposal.
>
> --MM
>
> *From:* cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org [
> mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org
> <cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org>] *On Behalf Of *Jonathan Robinson
> *Sent:* Thursday, January 8, 2015 11:43 AM
> *To:* cwg-stewardship at icann.org
> *Subject:* [CWG-Stewardship] RFP 3 Sub-Group (AKA RFP 3b) - CALL FOR
> VOLUNTEERS
> *Importance:* High
>
> All,
>
>
> *RFP 3 Sub-Group (AKA RFP 3b) - CALL FOR VOLUNTEERS *
> Please note this urgent call for volunteers for a sub-group of RFP3.
>
> The sub-group is  required to work together to further develop a variant
> proposal for the CWG which takes account of proposals and comments received
> by the CWG, particularly as they relate to a so-called “internal to ICANN”
> option or variant to the original draft proposal of the CWG.
>
> Allan Mc Gillivray has offered to assist with co-ordination of the group
> and it will need a committed team to work with Allan in short order to make
> the requisite progress.
>
> Thank-you.
>
>
> Jonathan
> CWG Co-chair
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CWG-Stewardship mailing list
> CWG-Stewardship at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CWG-Stewardship mailing list
> CWG-Stewardship at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
> *Seun Ojedeji, Federal University Oye-Ekiti web:      *
> *http://www.fuoye.edu.ng <http://www.fuoye.edu.ng> **Mobile:
> +2348035233535 <%2B2348035233535>*
> *alt email: <http://goog_1872880453>seun.ojedeji at fuoye.edu.ng
> <seun.ojedeji at fuoye.edu.ng>*
>
> The key to understanding is humility - my view !
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20150110/2ce59eaa/attachment.html>