[CWG-Stewardship] trying to understand this weekend

Avri Doria avri at acm.org
Sat Jan 10 14:55:02 UTC 2015


thanks

avri

On 10-Jan-15 09:39, Jonathan Robinson wrote:
>
> Hi Avri,
>
>  
>
> Thanks. It is certainly not the case to get a huddle of decision
> makers together but there is significant planning and  organisation
> work going on in the background.
>
>  
>
> We did discuss the structure and organisation of the weekend meetings
> on one or two occasions recently including in response to a question
> from Steve Crocker at the most recent meeting.
>
>  
>
> In any event, we will be clear on the purpose and organisation of the
> weekend sessions at the start of the first meeting today.
>
>  
>
> Jonathan
>
>  
>
> *From:*Avri Doria [mailto:avri at acm.org]
> *Sent:* 10 January 2015 08:54
> *To:* cwg-stewardship at icann.org
> *Subject:* [CWG-Stewardship] trying to understand this weekend
>
>  
>
> Hi,
>
> It has become apparent that there is a core group meeting at ICANN
> face to face on this intense work meeting.  They have perhaps even had
> closed meetings already.
>
> Seems a bit strange, and is a bit worrisome.
>
> Did we discuss this approach to the meeting?  If so, I missed the even
> the notification of this happening.
>
> Also, given that we have a component of folks who have traveled for a
> face 2 face, have they established a detailed agenda yet for the rest
> of us? 
>
> For the sake for transparency are their conversations being recorded,
> transcribed and published?
>
> I know when the schedule gets tight there is an urge to get a couple
> of 'reliable & reasonable' people together to huddle together to find
> a solution, but I worry that this will not help the rest of us reach
> consensus.
>
> thanks
>
> avri
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20150110/f076717b/attachment.html>


More information about the CWG-Stewardship mailing list