[CWG-Stewardship] RFP 3 Sub-Group (AKA RFP 3b) - CALL FOR VOLUNTEERS

Matthew Shears mshears at cdt.org
Mon Jan 12 11:15:35 UTC 2015


Likewise - thanks.

On 1/12/2015 4:17 AM, Greg Shatan wrote:
> Allan,
>
> Count me in as well.
>
> Greg Shatan
>
> On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 6:35 PM, Chris Disspain <ceo at auda.org.au 
> <mailto:ceo at auda.org.au>> wrote:
>
>     Hi Allan,
>
>     I’d like to work on this group.
>
>
>     Cheers,
>
>
>     Chris Disspain|Chief Executive Officer
>
>     .au Domain Administration Ltd
>
>     T: +61 3 8341 4111 <tel:%2B61%203%208341%204111>|F: +61 3 8341
>     4112 <tel:%2B61%203%208341%204112>
>
>     E:ceo at auda.org.au <mailto:ceo at auda.org.au> |W:www.auda.org.au
>     <http://www.auda.org.au/>
>
>     auDA – Australia’s Domain Name Administrator
>
>
>     *Important Notice****- *This email may contain information which
>     is confidential and/or subject to legal privilege, and is intended
>     for the use of the named addressee only. If you are not the
>     intended recipient, you must not use, disclose or copy any part of
>     this email. If you have received this email by mistake, please
>     notify the sender and delete this message immediately. Please
>     consider the environment before printing this email.
>
>
>     On 9 Jan 2015, at 10:46 , ALLAN MACGILLIVRAY
>     <allan.macgillivray at cira.ca <mailto:allan.macgillivray at cira.ca>>
>     wrote:
>
>>     Chris – thanks for volunteering.  We all know that time is very
>>     tight so I want to outline how I think we could best optimize our
>>     time and energy.
>>     As you know there are three main components to the current CWG
>>     proposal for the IANA functions: Contract Co; CSC and the MRT,
>>     setting the IAP aside, at least for the moment.  I propose that
>>     we focus on a variant of the CWG option which does not have, at
>>     least immediately, a ‘Contract Co’, but rather relies on some set
>>     of ‘triggers’ to create the separation of the IANA function from
>>     ICANN.  My hope is that we can develop a single proposal for
>>     discussion purposes and in this fashion, catch up to the work
>>     that has already been done on the full CWG proposal.  With such a
>>     focus on ‘no Contract Co’ we may also be able to set aside,
>>     again, at least for the moment, the CSC and the MRT as I believe
>>     there is a high degree of consensus that the functions that these
>>     two entities would perform are needed, that is operational
>>     oversight and periodic review respectively.
>>     This may seem to be a daunting task, but I would remind you that
>>     the core of the CWG proposal ran to only just 7 pages in the
>>     December 1 proposal.  I think that together we can put something
>>     credible together in a reasonable amount of time.
>>     It would be very helpful if the communities and organizations who
>>     had significant concerns with Contract Co and who also sought the
>>     development of such a proposal could actively participate as I
>>     fear it would lack credibility without them.  I am speaking in
>>     particular of auDA, SIDN, Google and ALAC.  If I have missed
>>     centring anyone out, you are still welcome to volunteer!
>>     Allan
>>     *From:*Christopher Wilkinson [mailto:lists at christopherwilkinson.eu]
>>     *Sent:*January-08-15 5:03 PM
>>     *To:*Jonathan Robinson; Allan MacGillivray
>>     *Cc:*cwg-stewardship at icann.org <mailto:cwg-stewardship at icann.org>
>>     *Subject:*Re: [CWG-Stewardship] RFP 3 Sub-Group (AKA RFP 3b) -
>>     CALL FOR VOLUNTEERS
>>     *Importance:*High
>>     Good evening: In the light of my pervious comments, I would be
>>     prepared to volunteer for this function.
>>     Regards
>>     CW
>>     On 08 Jan 2015, at 17:42, Jonathan Robinson
>>     <jrobinson at afilias.info <mailto:jrobinson at afilias.info>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>     All,
>>     *RFP 3 Sub-Group (AKA RFP 3b) - CALL FOR VOLUNTEERS*
>>     Please note this urgent call for volunteers for a sub-group of RFP3.
>>     The sub-group is  required to work together to further develop a
>>     variant proposal for the CWG which takes account of proposals and
>>     comments received by the CWG, particularly as they relate to a
>>     so-called “internal to ICANN” option or variant to the original
>>     draft proposal of the CWG.
>>     Allan Mc Gillivray has offered to assist with co-ordination of
>>     the group and it will need a committed team to work with Allan in
>>     short order to make the requisite progress.
>>     Thank-you.
>>     Jonathan
>>     CWG Co-chair
>>     _______________________________________________
>>     CWG-Stewardship mailing list
>>     CWG-Stewardship at icann.org <mailto:CWG-Stewardship at icann.org>
>>     https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
>>     _______________________________________________
>>     CWG-Stewardship mailing list
>>     CWG-Stewardship at icann.org <mailto:CWG-Stewardship at icann.org>
>>     https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     CWG-Stewardship mailing list
>     CWG-Stewardship at icann.org <mailto:CWG-Stewardship at icann.org>
>     https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CWG-Stewardship mailing list
> CWG-Stewardship at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship

-- 
Matthew Shears
Director - Global Internet Policy and Human Rights
Center for Democracy & Technology (CDT)
mshears at cdt.org
+ 44 771 247 2987

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20150112/d0c4c23f/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the CWG-Stewardship mailing list