[CWG-Stewardship] Chairs' Statement - Weekend Sessions 10 & 11 January 2015

[Gomes, Chuck]

Paul,

It is interesting that a lot of people in the public comments found the Frankfurt proposal too complicated and you seem to think the opposite.  One of the fairly common points made in the public comments was that the Frankfurt proposal was too complex.  As a result of that, one of our objectives in the CWG should be to do that as you suggest.  I my view of the weekend work, we identified quite a few areas of fairly strong CWG convergence that could help us do that going forward.

Chuck

-----Original Message-----
From: cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org [mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Paul M Kane - CWG
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2015 10:03 AM
To: jrobinson at afilias.info
Cc: cwg-stewardship at icann.org
Subject: Re: [CWG-Stewardship] Chairs' Statement - Weekend Sessions 10 & 11 January 2015

Thank you Jonathan and Lise

I found the week-end to be productive (if not hard to follow at some points) but do fear we are risking making the proposal VERY complicated.  

May I suggest we return to a simple, efficient and responsive IANA proposal...
along the lines of the Frankfurt discussion(s).

I also would like to suggest we make very clear to the ICG that their proposed timetable is far too optimistic and that more time will be needed by the Naming Community to develop a proposal that meets "the needs and expectation of the global customers and partners of the IANA services"

Best

Paul

Quoting Jonathan Robinson <jrobinson at afilias.info>:

> All,
> 
>  
> 
> Please see attached for a Chairs' Statement arising out of the weekend 
> sessions on 10 & 11 January 2015.
> 
>  
> 
> Thank-you to all who contributed time and energy to the sessions.
> 
>  
> 
> Best wishes,
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> Jonathan & Lise
> 
> 





_______________________________________________
CWG-Stewardship mailing list
CWG-Stewardship at icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship