[CWG-Stewardship] Do we need an extra scenario given the requirements formulated by the CCWG-Accountability ?
maarten.simon at sidn.nl
Mon Jan 26 09:18:06 UTC 2015
I have read the CCWG-Accountability Chairs’ statement and wonder if we should not also discuss a scenario for the situation where the CCWG-Accountability will be successful in reaching their first requirement:
“Enabling community empowerment over ICANN Board decisions with limited, strictly enumerated, last resort powers;"
As far as I understand, these last resort powers are meant to include the powers with regard to the IANA functions. I figure that if the community will already have the final say over the IANA functions through these last resort powers, that:
1. There will be no need for an external solution where the same community will be given the final say over the IANA functions;
2. There is no need for an MRT;
3. There might be a need for a CSC (maybe a CSC plus);
But maybe I am oversimplifying things here ?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the CWG-Stewardship