[CWG-Stewardship] Updated Legal Scoping Document (Version 3)
jp1 at expri.com
Thu Jan 29 16:07:19 UTC 2015
Thanks Greg for the reply--it has been hectic I know.
On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 10:00 AM, Greg Shatan <gregshatanipc at gmail.com>
> Thanks for your follow-up. I assure you that I (and others) have read
> (more than once) your email yesterday, and considered it as well. I have
> also brought up with our chairs the best ways to re-integrate this option
> into both our legal advice and into our work. A response is forthcoming.
> It's been only 24 hours since you sent your email....
> A lack of a reply does not signify a lack of interest or a lack of
> courtesy -- just a too-long queue of emails to respond to, and the
> thought-provoking ones take longer to respond to substantively. I'll
> respond substantively in a reply to that email (just to keep all the
> linkages as straight as possible).
> But I will assure you here that this is absolutely a process fully aligned
> with Larry Strickling's point quoted in your email
> Best regards,
> Greg Shatan
> *Gregory S. Shatan **ï* *Abelman Frayne & Schwab*
> *Partner** | IP | Technology | Media | Internet*
> *666 Third Avenue | New York, NY 10017-5621*
> *Direct* 212-885-9253 *| **Main* 212-949-9022
> *Fax* 212-949-9190 *|* *Cell *917-816-6428
> *gsshatan at lawabel.com <gsshatan at lawabel.com>*
> *ICANN-related: gregshatanipc at gmail.com <gregshatanipc at gmail.com> *
> *www.lawabel.com <http://www.lawabel.com/> *
> On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 9:45 AM, John Poole <jp1 at expri.com> wrote:
>> *"We support a process where all ideas are welcome and where participants
>> are able to test fully all transition options."--Larry Strickling, NTIA,
>> January 27, 2015*
>> Dear Greg* et al:*
>> I would appreciate the courtesy of a reply or response to my email
>> yesterday concerning Legal Scoping Document (Version 3).
>> Best regards,
>> John Poole
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the CWG-Stewardship