[CWG-Stewardship] [client com] PTI Board Composition: IANA Managing Director
Gomes, Chuck
cgomes at verisign.com
Wed Jul 1 22:10:22 UTC 2015
I think the idea of forming an Implementation Review Team is worth considering. Guidelines for IRTs are provided in the GNSO Policy & Implementation Final Report. Granted that report was done for the GNSO but as a biased co-chair of that WG, I think that they would be broadly applicable to the CWG.
Chuck
-----Original Message-----
From: cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org [mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Avri Doria
Sent: Wednesday, July 01, 2015 4:52 PM
To: cwg-stewardship at icann.org
Subject: Re: [CWG-Stewardship] [client com] PTI Board Composition: IANA Managing Director
+1
On 01-Jul-15 16:45, Greg Shatan wrote:
> Andrew,
>
> As I mentioned, these could be handled by an Implementation Review
> Team working in conjunction with staff, which is the current GNSO
> approach to dealing with post-WG issues. Furthermore, we have clearly
> heard the message that this proposal is not going to succeed in
> getting the NTIA and Congressional approvals it needs if
> implementation is not factored in in some fashion. If we act like
> implementation is "not our problem," because it's not within the four
> corners of our charter, we are creating a problem, not solving one.
>
> In any event, we have discussed the need for the CWG to remain in
> place not only to interact with the ICG, but to be available to
> respond to inquiries from the NTIA and Congress. If that's not
> contemplated in the Charter, we should address that. It's highly
> unusual for an ICANN WG to have a proposal that requires external
> approvals, so if this is not contemplated in the Charter, it's because
> the current situation was not foreseen.
>
> If you think our work is done, other than answering questions, and
> that the implementation should be left to "other people," that's fine.
> Others have proposed extending the CWG, or believe that our mandate is
> broad enough to cover further activity without an extension or charter
> revision.
>
> But between the CWG, the ICG and ICANN, there needs to be some
> understanding of who those other people are, and how they well turn
> our blueprints into a structure that actually exists.
>
> If we wipe our hands and walk away, because the proposal is now in the
> ICG's hands, we might as well never have started in the first place.
>
> Greg
>
> On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 4:08 PM, Andrew Sullivan
> <ajs at anvilwalrusden.com <mailto:ajs at anvilwalrusden.com>> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jul 01, 2015 at 03:48:59PM -0400, Greg Shatan wrote:
> > that is the case, we have not discussed whether the CWG/IRT will
> provide
> > "terms of reference" for those bylaws, whether CWG/IRT and
> outside counsel
> > will review drafts of these articles and bylaws, etc.
>
> Is that within the charter? I'm not sure. My reading of the charter
> is that the goal was to produce a proposal. It has been produced,
> because it's shipped. That's the only top-line deliverable, in my
> reading.
>
> There are two further items, which involve interaction with the ICG.
>
> I don't see anything in the charter about proposals for the
> implementation and so on. I could easily be mistaken, however.
>
> This is the charter I was reading:
>
> https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocwgdtstwrdshp/Charter
>
> Best regards,
>
> A
> --
> Andrew Sullivan
> ajs at anvilwalrusden.com <mailto:ajs at anvilwalrusden.com>
> _______________________________________________
> CWG-Stewardship mailing list
> CWG-Stewardship at icann.org <mailto:CWG-Stewardship at icann.org>
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CWG-Stewardship mailing list
> CWG-Stewardship at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
_______________________________________________
CWG-Stewardship mailing list
CWG-Stewardship at icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
More information about the CWG-Stewardship
mailing list