[CWG-Stewardship] [client com] FW: Important: Final Proposal for review until 23:59 UTC on 10 June

Thu Jun 11 00:14:24 UTC 2015

A few minutes late, but...

In paragraph 125, page 24 of V4, I can live with 
the current wording about the optional Public 
Comment but meaningful AC/SO consultation.

However, the wording change I requested to 
clarify that the BOTH the ccNSO and GNSO approval is needed was not made.

...triggered by a supermajority vote of each of the ccNSO and GNSO Councils ...

should read

...triggered by a supermajority vote of BOTH of the ccNSO and GNSO Councils...

(Caps added to highlight the change in this 
message. The "of" following "both" is probably not needed.)

Alan

At 09/06/2015 10:59 PM, Grace Abuhamad wrote:

>Forwarding again to Client Committee.
>
>From: Grace Abuhamad 
><<mailto:grace.abuhamad at icann.org>grace.abuhamad at icann.org>
>Date: Tuesday, June 9, 2015 at 5:46 PM
>To: Brenda Brewer 
><<mailto:brenda.brewer at icann.org>brenda.brewer at icann.org>, 
>"<mailto:cwg-stewardship at icann.org>cwg-stewardship at icann.org" 
><<mailto:cwg-stewardship at icann.org>cwg-stewardship at icann.org>
>Subject: [CWG-Stewardship] Important: Final 
>Proposal for review until 23:59UTC on 10 June
>
>Dear all,
>
>During our meeting today, we had our 3rd and 
>final reading of the Proposal. Changes were made 
>live, and outstanding changes were noted as 
>action items (see notes below). The staff team 
>has reviewed the proposal and completed all 
>actions listed. Please note that Sidley will 
>provide a final review as well which includes 
>some work on the implementation text in Section 
>IV and the Term Sheet in Annex S.
>
>With this, the CWG-Stewardship now enters into a 
>final review period that lasts until 23:59 UTC 
>tomorrow (10 June). As noted on the call, the 
>intention of the review period is to do a 
>‘proofread’ and notify the group of any errors. 
>During this period of 26 hours, any statements 
>or comments on the Proposal may also be sent to 
>the group. As the Chairs noted on the call, if 
>you are making a statement, please be sure to 
>identify whether you do so as a member on behalf 
>of a Chartering Organization, as an individual 
>representing a specific organization, or as an 
>individual with a personal remark/contribution.
>
>After 23:59 UTC on 10 June, the Chairs will work 
>with staff to rectify any errors, update section 
>VI.C. regarding statements, and deliver the 
>Proposal to the Chartering Organizations on 11 
>June. Our call on 11 June will focus on how the 
>CWG-Stewardship does its engagement, through its 
>members and participants, to coalesce support 
>for the Proposal among Chartering Organizations. 
>In addition, there are two webinars on 11 June 
>(one at 06:00 UTC and one at 13:00 UTC): 
><https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2015-06-03-en>https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2015-06-03-en. 
>These webinars aim to provide a briefing to the 
>broader community about the contents of the 
>final proposal. Finally, as we head into ICANN53 
>in Buenos Aires, please refer to the schedule of 
>sessions that relate to the CWG-Stewardship 
>work: 
><https://community.icann.org/x/EJg0Aw>https://community.icann.org/x/EJg0Aw.
>
>Thank you all for your great work and dedication 
>to the process. Please contact us if you have 
>any questions regarding the process or administration over the next 48h.
>
>Best,
>Gramika (Grace+Marika)
>
>
>From: Brenda Brewer <<mailto:brenda.brewer at icann.org>brenda.brewer at icann.org>
>Date: Tuesday, June 9, 2015 at 4:01 PM
>To: 
>"<mailto:cwg-stewardship at icann.org>cwg-stewardship at icann.org" 
><<mailto:cwg-stewardship at icann.org>cwg-stewardship at icann.org>
>Subject: [CWG-Stewardship] Notes, Recordings, 
>Transcript CWG IANA #58 9 June 2015
>
>[]
>
>Dear all,
>
>The notes, recordings and transcripts for the 
>CWG IANA Meeting # 58 on 9 June 2015 are 
>available here: 
><https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=53778032>https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=53778032
>
>Kind regards,
>Brenda
>
>
>
>
>Action Items
>
>
>
>
>
>Paragraph 108:  Action: In document text, remove --> "as it is customary"
>
>Paragraph 134:  Action: conform text to the 
>defined terms used in the rest of the Proposal, among other things
>
>Paragraph 155: Action: remove capitals in "standing committee"
>
>Section IV: Action: Sidley to provide text on PTI implementation.
>
>Annex H: Action: remove escalation paragraph and preamble
>
>Annex J: Action: edits to #3 should be cross-checked with CSC Charter
>
>Action: conform text to the defined terms used 
>in the rest of the Proposal, among other things
>
>
>
>Notes
>
>
>
>
>
>1. Opening Remarks
>·        A big thanks to all who contributed to edits.
>·        Following closure of this meeting, 
>staff will send final document  to the CWG.
>·        CWG will then have 24h to notify the 
>group of any errors. Intention is not to reopen 
>issues, but to focus on proofing --> DUE AT 23:59 UTC on 10 JUNE
>·        Chairs will transmit to SO/ACs on 11 June with covering note.
>
>2. Finalizing the Review Tool & Responses
>
>Can expect a final version to be circulated in 
>the next 24h. Staff is working on 
>consistency-checking across the responses. The 
>document is frozen as of 1 June.
>
>3. Update on questions to ICANN Finance & Legal
>
>The letter and responses from ICANN are posted 
>on Wiki: 
><https://community.icann.org/x/7Jk0Aw>https://community.icann.org/x/7Jk0Aw.
>
>Staff have included the responses in Section IV 
>(and included an Annex to for the Finance information).
>
>4. Last Review of Final Proposal
>
>On screen now is version 5. The difference 
>between the previous version and the latest is 
>that the Chairs took some time to review which 
>items were still open and which had been 
>resolved. Tried to focus CWG on the key 
>outstanding issues. This latest version also 
>includes the DT-A annex which has now been included.
>
>Paragraph 108: Change the wording from 
>"ringfence" to "isolate" and remove the 
>definition in the footnote.  ICANN has control 
>and ownership of PTI and the implementation 
>documents will assure against further transfer out of assets.
>
>Action: In document text, remove --> "as it is customary"
>
>Paragraph 121/ Footnote 11: footnote is satisfactory.
>
>Paragraph 125: make clear "supermajority from 
>both" ccNSO and GNSO. Also including the CSC as part of the remit.
>
>Paragraph 128: covered by resolution in paragraph 121
>
>Paragraph 134: SLEs discussion -- principles are 
>included in annex and summary is included in the section now.
>
>Action: conform text to the defined terms used 
>in the rest of the Proposal, among other things
>
>Paragraph 155: Action: remove capitals in "standing committee"
>
>Section IV: Action: Sidley to provide text on PTI implementation.
>
>Annex G: edit to the Remedial Action Procedures table
>
>Annex H: Action: remove escalation paragraph and preamble
>
>Annex J: Action: edits to #3 should be cross-checked with CSC Charter
>
>Term Sheet: staff to revise with comments from Sidley and Greg
>
>5. Overall Timeline / Milestones
>
>     a. Communications
>
>     b. Webinars on 11 June
>
>     c. Sessions at ICANN 53
>
>6. AOB
>
>     a. Thursday 11 June -- 1 hour call about CWG engagement
>
>     b. Canceling Tuesday 16 June call
>
>     c. Client Committee on Friday 12 June
>
>7. Closing Remarks
>
>After proposal is sent, 24h to respond with 
>comments or statements DUE AT 23:59 UTC on 10 JUNE
>
>
>
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Cwg-client mailing list
>Cwg-client at icann.org
>https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-client
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20150610/c368f4a2/attachment.html>