[CWG-Stewardship] Principles: revised draft 11 March
Avri Doria
avri at acm.org
Wed Mar 11 20:20:15 UTC 2015
Hi,
On 11-Mar-15 15:58, Martin Boyle wrote:
> 5.iv footnote: We had comments about the meaning of consensus in the
> footnote. I do not think that defining consensus is in the remit of
> this document, but is part of the considerations of any entity that we
> establish. Hence I have added, “Conditions for consensus will need to
> be agreed appropriate for the group” to make this clear. In response
> to Christopher Wilkinson, I have amended the footnote to read “one or
> more members”.
as this was my issue, just wanted to say I am comfortable with the change.
Thanks
avri
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
http://www.avast.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20150311/9f3bcb8b/attachment.html>
More information about the CWG-Stewardship
mailing list