[CWG-Stewardship] Fwd: Request for Communication with CWG-Stewardship on Naming Related Functions

Grace Abuhamad grace.abuhamad at icann.org
Wed Mar 25 07:06:07 UTC 2015

Dear all ‹ this has been sent to the Chairs. Forwarding to the group.

>-------- Forwarded Message --------
>Subject: Request for Communication with CWG-Stewardship on Naming Related
>Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2015 13:57:55 +0900
>From: Izumi Okutani <izumi at nic.ad.jp>
>To: Jonathan Robinson <jrobinson at afilias.info>, Lise Fuhr
><lise.fuhr at difo.dk>
>CC: Alan Barrett <apb at cequrux.com>
>Dear Jonathan and Lise,
>I am writing to you as Chair of the Consolidated RIR IANA Stewardship
>Proposal (CRISP) team, responsible for preparation of the numbers
>community's response to the ICG's Request for Proposals.
>It was helpful to have the update on the CWG for Naming Related Functions
>progress at the session in Singapore, including the revised timeline of
>the process proposed by the CWG-Names, with a CWG-Names proposal
>submission in June later this year. This revised timeline increases the
>need for collaborative and constructive work in the ICG as well as
>between all three stakeholder communities to progress efficiently with
>the timeline. We remain positive that a proposal satisfactory to all
>parties, can be produced through this process.
>The ICG's decision to seek proposals from the three separate affected
>communities reflects the distinct needs, mechanisms and historical
>development of these three communities. At the same time, developing a
>proposal that satisfactorily addresses stewardship of all the IANA
>functions is a priority for all parties.
>With this in mind, I would like to request that the Chairs of the
>CWG-Names communicate directly to the Chair and Vice-Chair of the CRISP
>team, regarding any proposals or developments that might affect the
>numbers community in advance, and not wait for the final submission to
>the ICG.
>This level of direct communication and collaboration will allow all
>communities to consider the impact and potential compatibility issues
>among the proposals ahead of the ICG consolidation process, consult
>appropriately within their communities, and, if necessary, develop
>appropriate responses efficiently, rather than wait for inputs from the
>numbers community after the ICG consolidates proposal from all the
>operational communities. Such bottom-up consideration by all communities
>will be essential to the authority and success of any final proposal to
>the NTIA.
>I look forward to hearing of your continued progress, and to work
>collaboratively with you to achieve a successful outcome for all, of the
>IANA Stewardship transition.
>Kind regards,
>Izumi Okutani, Alan Barrett
>CRISP Team Chair, Vice-Chair
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 5108 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20150325/33aef024/smime-0001.p7s>

More information about the CWG-Stewardship mailing list