[CWG-Stewardship] Request for Communication with CWG-Stewardship on Naming Related Functions

[James Gannon]

Could we maybe get this added as a quick discussion point for the F2F tomorrow/Friday?

James

On 25 Mar 2015, at 09:06, Grace Abuhamad <grace.abuhamad at icann.org> wrote:

> Dear all ‹ this has been sent to the Chairs. Forwarding to the group.
> 
>> 
>> 
>> -------- Forwarded Message --------
>> Subject: Request for Communication with CWG-Stewardship on Naming Related
>> Functions
>> Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2015 13:57:55 +0900
>> From: Izumi Okutani <izumi at nic.ad.jp>
>> To: Jonathan Robinson <jrobinson at afilias.info>, Lise Fuhr
>> <lise.fuhr at difo.dk>
>> CC: Alan Barrett <apb at cequrux.com>
>> 
>> Dear Jonathan and Lise,
>> 
>> 
>> I am writing to you as Chair of the Consolidated RIR IANA Stewardship
>> Proposal (CRISP) team, responsible for preparation of the numbers
>> community's response to the ICG's Request for Proposals.
>> 
>> It was helpful to have the update on the CWG for Naming Related Functions
>> progress at the session in Singapore, including the revised timeline of
>> the process proposed by the CWG-Names, with a CWG-Names proposal
>> submission in June later this year. This revised timeline increases the
>> need for collaborative and constructive work in the ICG as well as
>> between all three stakeholder communities to progress efficiently with
>> the timeline. We remain positive that a proposal satisfactory to all
>> parties, can be produced through this process.
>> 
>> The ICG's decision to seek proposals from the three separate affected
>> communities reflects the distinct needs, mechanisms and historical
>> development of these three communities. At the same time, developing a
>> proposal that satisfactorily addresses stewardship of all the IANA
>> functions is a priority for all parties.
>> 
>> With this in mind, I would like to request that the Chairs of the
>> CWG-Names communicate directly to the Chair and Vice-Chair of the CRISP
>> team, regarding any proposals or developments that might affect the
>> numbers community in advance, and not wait for the final submission to
>> the ICG.
>> 
>> This level of direct communication and collaboration will allow all
>> communities to consider the impact and potential compatibility issues
>> among the proposals ahead of the ICG consolidation process, consult
>> appropriately within their communities, and, if necessary, develop
>> appropriate responses efficiently, rather than wait for inputs from the
>> numbers community after the ICG consolidates proposal from all the
>> operational communities. Such bottom-up consideration by all communities
>> will be essential to the authority and success of any final proposal to
>> the NTIA.
>> 
>> I look forward to hearing of your continued progress, and to work
>> collaboratively with you to achieve a successful outcome for all, of the
>> IANA Stewardship transition.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Kind regards,
>> 
>> Izumi Okutani, Alan Barrett
>> CRISP Team Chair, Vice-Chair
>> ___________________
>> 
> _______________________________________________
> CWG-Stewardship mailing list
> CWG-Stewardship at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship