[CWG-Stewardship] FAQ on Legal Counsel Memorandum on Proposed Post-Transition Structure

[Cheryl Langdon-Orr]

Well done Chuck I support those edits
On 09/05/2015 9:24 am, "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes at verisign.com> wrote:

>  The FAQ is very good and very helpful but I suggest that the three
> bullets under the strengths for Question 1 be reordered as follows:
>
>
>
> ·        The proposed structure allows for a formal contract between
> ICANN and the
>
> IANA functions operator, which further evidences and supports functional
>
> separation.
>
>
>
> ·        Without a contract, other means of establishing expectations
> regarding
>
> performance levels and related terms would need to be identified, which
> would
>
> likely be less formal and less enforceable than through a contractual
> relationship.
>
> Recourse for a “breach” of those terms and conditions would be limited to
>
> internal redress mechanisms such as through the IFR team and the CSC.
>
>
>
> ·        If there is a future need to separate or divest ICANN of the
> IANA functions, the
>
> work of identifying and segregating assets will have already been done.
> This
>
> should enhance the separability of the IANA functions.
>
>
>
> All I did is move what was the first bullet to the last bullet.  Because
> separation is perceived as a last resort and unlikely option, it doesn’t
> seem to me that we should lead with that advantage.
>
>
>
> Chuck
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org [mailto:
> cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org] *On Behalf Of *Grace Abuhamad
> *Sent:* Friday, May 08, 2015 4:12 PM
> *To:* cwg-stewardship at icann.org
> *Subject:* [CWG-Stewardship] FAQ on Legal Counsel Memorandum on Proposed
> Post-Transition Structure
>
>
>
> Dear all,
>
>
>
> To help inform the public comment proceeding, we have put together a FAQ
> based on Sidley's memorandum from 3 May. This FAQ will be posted on the
> Public Comment page within the hour and included in the reference documents
> related to the proposal:
> https://www.icann.org/public-comments/cwg-stewardship-draft-proposal-2015-04-22-en
>
>
>
> We are working on a more extensive FAQ based on the questions received
> during the webinars.
>
>
>
> Have a good weekend,
>
> Grace
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CWG-Stewardship mailing list
> CWG-Stewardship at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20150509/27b66dd4/attachment-0001.html>