[CWG-Stewardship] Fwd: Re: [DTA - SLE] SLE Document with clarifying background info.

[Paul M Kane - CWG]

Quoting Andrew Sullivan <ajs at anvilwalrusden.com>:

> Why is it no longer "fit for purpose"?  

NTIA is not going to be there and many ccTLDs are not party to any agreement with 
ICANN


What possible reason is there to
> change the SLA, 


We have recorded the ACTUAL IANA RZM performance with NTIA being involved using 
data published by IANA.

An SLA prescribing 21 days to change a DS record or name server that bears no 
relation to actual performance delivered is not fit for purpose IMHO

> except for the party to which the assurance is offered?  

Correct - I agree

The registry community need assurance that at the very least the actual 
performance delivered today continues post transition.


We
> have a running system, and we should change as little as possible as part of
> the transition: this is just prudent engineering.  
> 

Agree here too. The goal is not to change the system but to have proper monitoring

Best

Paul

Ps I am travelling this w/end (no Internet access in 30 mins)  back on Monday


> A
> 
> -- 
> Andrew Sullivan 
> Please excuse my clumbsy thums. 
> 
> > On May 9, 2015, at 10:19, Paul M Kane - CWG <paul.kane-cwg at icb.co.uk>
> wrote:
> > 
> > Thanks Milton
> > 
> > I sincerely hope that ICANN legal are NOT interfering with how IANA staff
> > deliver technical services to the community. 
> > 
> > What DT-A has done is capture the current performance delivered by IANA as
> the
> > baseline for any post transition SLE - see the a draft SLE document under
> > discussion attached......  
> > 
> > Currently IANA delivers to the community Name Server updates, DS Record
> updates,
> > WHOIS updates well within a week - and this includes having NTIA in the
> loop -
> > so having an SLA that stipulates 21days for such tasks is clearly no longer
> fit
> > for purpose.
> > 
> > Attached is the statistical analysis of current performance based on IANA's
> data
> > presented to the CWG in March
> >
> https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/52891144/DT-A_Statistical-
Final.pdf?version=1&modificationDate=1426003475000&api=v2
> > 
> > I genuinely believe IANA staff are trying to provide the information (true
> IANA
> > needs to invest in monitoring the performance of their RZM systems - but
> that is
> > trivial, two days of a competent programmers time would provide IANA and
> the
> > community with the required matrices).
> > 
> > It would be a great shame for ICANN legal to prevent the IANA service which
> is
> > delivered to the community today from being accurately captured by the SLE
> > Group.... time will tell... and I am optimistic we will receive
> constructive input.
> > 
> > Best
> > 
> > Paul
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Quoting Milton L Mueller <mueller at syr.edu>:
> > 
> >> Better read the letter carefully, Paul
> >> It is pure 100% distilled essence of ICANN legal. 
> >> As I read the letter, they have not given you anything that is not
> already
> >> published on the web. 
> >> 
> >>> -----Original Message-----
> >>> From: cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org [mailto:cwg-stewardship-
> >>> bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Paul M Kane - CWG
> >>> Sent: Friday, May 8, 2015 2:50 PM
> >>> To: Grace Abuhamad
> >>> Cc: cwg-stewardship at icann.org
> >>> Subject: [CWG-Stewardship] Fwd: Re: [DTA - SLE] SLE Document with
> >>> clarifying background info.
> >>> 
> >>> Grace,
> >>> 
> >>> Many thanks for helping DT-A obtain the current detailed IANA work
> >>> flow information....
> >>> 
> >>> Have a great w/end
> >>> 
> >>> Best
> >>> 
> >>> Paul
> >>> 
> >>> Begin forwarded message:
> >>> 
> >>> 
> >>> ----- Forwarded message from Paul M Kane - CWG <paul.kane-
> >>> cwg at icb.co.uk> -----
> >>>    Date: Fri,  8 May 2015 19:42:18 +0100
> >>>    From: Paul M Kane - CWG <paul.kane-cwg at icb.co.uk>
> >>> Reply-To: Paul M Kane - CWG <paul.kane-cwg at icb.co.uk>
> >>> Subject: Re: [DTA - SLE] SLE Document with clarifying background info.
> >>>      To: Elise Gerich <elise.gerich at icann.org>
> >>> 
> >>> Thanks Elise
> >>> 
> >>> I confirm receipt of the response from ICANN Legal following our DIDP
> >>> request.
> >>> 
> >>> On or after the 12th May 2015, we look forward to receiving the
> >>> current detailed IANA process workflow documents (with comments
> >>> as to why any "sensitive"
> >>> information has been redacted) so we can work cooperatively with
> >>> you to create a professional Service Level Expectation (SLE) document
> >>> for the benefit of the whole community.
> >>> 
> >>> Have a great w/end
> >>> 
> >>> Best
> >>> 
> >>> Paul
> > 
> > <CWG-DRAFT-SLE-DTA.pdf>
> > _______________________________________________
> > CWG-Stewardship mailing list
> > CWG-Stewardship at icann.org
> > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
> 
>