[CWG-Stewardship] [DTA - SLE] SLE Document with clarifying background info.

[Seun Ojedeji]

sent from Google nexus 4
kindly excuse brevity and typos.
On 10 May 2015 06:40, "Bill Woodcock" <woody at pch.net> wrote:
>
>
> > On May 9, 2015, at 7:39 PM, Andrew Sullivan <ajs at anvilwalrusden.com>
wrote:
> >
> > This is basically an argument that we have to do everything at the time
of transition because after that it'll be impossible to get changes.  If
that's true, then the accountability changes will have been inadequate. If
that's what we think will happen, we should resist the transition _at all_.
>
> The argument that’s been presented to me is that once _Congress_ has
allowed the transition to go forward, _Congress_ will lose any opportunity
to tinker under ICANN’s hood, so _Congress_ wants to do any tinkering now,
before allowing the transition to go forward.
>
SO:
Yeah and the community powers would have come into action; so while
Congress losses the opportunity, the community will gain the opportunity.
What Congress may need to ensure is that the accountability mechanisms
proposed gets implemented before transition and I think the last letter
from NTIA to the Chairs of the various communities was quite strong about
that.

Regards
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CWG-Stewardship mailing list
> CWG-Stewardship at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20150510/9516716c/attachment.html>