[CWG-Stewardship] update on DT X Separation Process
Avri Doria
avri at acm.org
Mon May 11 22:19:09 UTC 2015
Hi,
I did an update on the file.
<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1WvBqtgXJ7rNrbN-5Tjf5-gi80aZ2oRYDtF_JLrETRqg/edit?usp=sharing>
and attached a pdf version to this note.
* Received some comments which I tried to include
* Responded to Sibley comments, I think
* Largely separated the process from who does it
* left bracketed text on the sticky decisions, which include:
o who dies it:
+ [A cross community of the SOAC would be formed, The IFR
would be designated]
o how it is initiated:
+ on the recommendation of the IANA Review Function as
approved by [Board, SOAC, members council], or in the case
of Board rejection via escalation procedure.
+ on supermajority recommendation of both GNSO & ccNSO
+ on recommendation of 1 SO and 2 ACs
o method of operation
+ The Separation Review would be either a(decision to be made
by CWG)
#
A process initiated in the IFR
#
Function as a Cross Community Working Group and would
follow established guidelines for multistakeholder cross
community working groups. In this case the participants
would be either (decision to be made by CWG):
1.
Each of the AC/SO would appoint 5 people to the
Separation Review.
2. Alternatively: Use the ICG community inclusion and
proportions to include the broader community as this
will affect the entire community.
Unfortunately I have another commitment during tomorrow's meeting so
will miss the middle hour, but I do think this is something that the
group needs to figure out at some point in the near future.
avri
o
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
http://www.avast.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: DT-XSeparationProcess(3).pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 241007 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20150512/73a4669f/DT-XSeparationProcess3-0001.pdf>
More information about the CWG-Stewardship
mailing list