[CWG-Stewardship] update on DT X Separation Process

[Gomes, Chuck]

Avri,

Why would the recommendations of this review need to be approved by the ICANN board?

The fifth possible separation mechanism is " Initiate full separation of the IANA affiliate".  Does this mean separation of PTI from ICANN?

Chuck

-----Original Message-----
From: cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org [mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Avri Doria
Sent: Monday, May 11, 2015 6:19 PM
To: cwg-stewardship at icann.org
Subject: [CWG-Stewardship] update on DT X Separation Process

Hi,

I did an update on the file.
<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1WvBqtgXJ7rNrbN-5Tjf5-gi80aZ2oRYDtF_JLrETRqg/edit?usp=sharing>
and attached a pdf version to this note.

  * Received some comments which I tried to include
  * Responded to Sibley comments, I think
  * Largely separated the process from who does it
  * left bracketed text on the sticky decisions, which include:
      o who dies it:
          + [A cross community of the SOAC would be formed, The IFR
            would be designated]
      o how it is initiated: 
          + on the recommendation of the IANA Review Function as
            approved by [Board, SOAC, members council], or in the case
            of Board rejection via escalation procedure.
          + on supermajority recommendation of both GNSO & ccNSO
          + on recommendation of 1 SO and 2 ACs
      o method of operation
          + The Separation Review would be either a(decision to be made
            by CWG)
              #

                A process initiated in the IFR

              #

                Function as a Cross Community Working Group and would
                follow established guidelines for multistakeholder cross
                community working groups. In this case the participants
                would be either (decision to be made by CWG):

             1.

                Each of the AC/SO would appoint 5 people to the
                Separation Review.

             2. Alternatively: Use the ICG community inclusion and
                proportions to include the broader community as this
                will affect the entire community.


Unfortunately I have another commitment during tomorrow's meeting so will miss the middle hour,  but I do think this is something that the group needs to figure out at some point in the near future.

avri

      o



---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
http://www.avast.com