[CWG-Stewardship] update on DT X Separation Process

[Gomes, Chuck]

Avri,

I assume then that you think the SR should be an process within ICANN rather than one outside ICANN.  Is that correct?

Chuck

-----Original Message-----
From: cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org [mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Avri Doria
Sent: Friday, May 15, 2015 9:25 AM
To: cwg-stewardship at icann.org
Subject: Re: [CWG-Stewardship] update on DT X Separation Process

hi,


On 15-May-15 15:01, Gomes, Chuck wrote:
> Another question is this:  will the separation process be an ICANN 
> process or a process outside of ICANN.  If it is an ICANN process, it 
> might follow that the Board would approve any recommendations.  But if 
> it is a community process outside of ICANN, that would not seem to be 
> the case.  A corollary question is "Why would the ICANN board approve 
> a recommendation to separate PTI from ICANN

I think that as a review process the Board is in the approval chain.

As to why they would sign?  Because the community recommended it, just as they sign off on the ATRT recommendations.
And if they didn't then there are the accountability escalation mechanisms.

As for whether an AR process would need Board signoff.  Not sure, kind of depends on how it is set up and whether we have some sort of member's council.  But since they are the ones that have to sign the contract post RFP or whatever, it seems sort of a moot question.

avri

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
http://www.avast.com

_______________________________________________
CWG-Stewardship mailing list
CWG-Stewardship at icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship