[CWG-Stewardship] update on DT X Separation Process

[Seun Ojedeji]

Well all I am saying is we should not liken change of IANA operator to that
of ISP, the level of simplicity is just different. For me it's not just
about the switching, it's also about how that may impact the
stability/security of IANA operation.

However should it be possible to change? Absolutely but for unresolvable
reasons which I am glad you seem to agree to as well.

Regards
PS: I am currently in the process of changing ISP for an organisation and I
can tell you that changing is not always simple in that world as well ;-)

sent from Google nexus 4
kindly excuse brevity and typos.
On 15 May 2015 22:50, "Milton L Mueller" <mueller at syr.edu> wrote:

>
>
>
>
> I don't think the change is as simple as that;
>
> MM: apparently you haven’t changed ISPs lately. ;-) Not so simple
>
> A change of IANA operator goes beyond just swapping and signing contract,
> the experience history in the current IANA operating staff will be lost and
> that is of great importance to me. Secondly i think its quite an hypothesis
> to already determined that the new IANA operator is a good one, without
> having tried them in any way.
>
> MM: The IANA operator will be changed only if the “current IANA operating
> staff” has so frustrated its users that they want to change. So yes, their
> experience history will be discarded but only if our experience and history
> with them is bad. And yes, you don’t really know for sure how the new one
> will perform – this is exactly like an ISP change and a lot of other
> service changes
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20150516/25aaaf05/attachment.html>