[CWG-Stewardship] Fate of the .INT domain

Bill Woodcock woody at pch.net
Sun May 17 17:30:21 UTC 2015



> On May 17, 2015, at 19:19, Andrew Sullivan <ajs at anvilwalrusden.com> wrote:
> 
>> On Sun, May 17, 2015 at 04:20:57PM +0000, Milton L Mueller wrote:
>> It _is_ "broken" to have the root zone file editor running a TLD, especially one that connects it to intergovernmental organizations.
> 
> Why?  That is the state of affairs prior to transition.  Why is it a
> bad thing afterwards?

Because it was an equally bad thing before, but equally not in need of urgent fixing?

                -Bill




More information about the CWG-Stewardship mailing list