[CWG-Stewardship] Fate of the .INT domain

[Avri Doria]

Hi,

Do we have any idea of what the .int 2nd level registrants want? 
Do we care?

avri


On 17-May-15 19:30, Bill Woodcock wrote:
>
>> On May 17, 2015, at 19:19, Andrew Sullivan <ajs at anvilwalrusden.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Sun, May 17, 2015 at 04:20:57PM +0000, Milton L Mueller wrote:
>>> It _is_ "broken" to have the root zone file editor running a TLD, especially one that connects it to intergovernmental organizations.
>> Why?  That is the state of affairs prior to transition.  Why is it a
>> bad thing afterwards?
> Because it was an equally bad thing before, but equally not in need of urgent fixing?
>
>                 -Bill
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CWG-Stewardship mailing list
> CWG-Stewardship at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
>
>


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
http://www.avast.com