[CWG-Stewardship] Fate of the .INT domain

[Alan Greenberg]

Milton, I do appreciate the leadership role you 
are playing, but I note (from 
https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocwgdtstwrdshp/Design+Teams+List):

Design Team H: .INT Operations

Lead: Elise Lindeberg

Status: Not Needed/Covered Elsewhere

Note: Priority 2 – Chairs understand that this 
issue is being dealt with by the GAC.

Alan

At 17/05/2015 06:12 PM, Milton L Mueller wrote:
>Yes, Andrew to your credit you've been 
>consistent about this. But I have also been 
>consistent in advocating that we fix whatever 
>needs fixing during this process. ;-)
>
>--MM
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> >
> > Right, that's my point.  There is nothing wrong with a transition plan that
> > says of int, "Status quo ante, nothing to see 
> here."  Which is I think what is
> > being suggested.  That doesn't mean I think 
> it should never be changed, but I
> > don't see why it needs to be linked to this, any more than I think SLA
> > changes or other not strictly relevant operational adjustments ought to be
> > included.
> >
>_______________________________________________
>CWG-Stewardship mailing list
>CWG-Stewardship at icann.org
>https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship