[CWG-Stewardship] Fate of the .INT domain

[Milton L Mueller]

Is there a report from DT-H? 

--MM

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alan Greenberg [mailto:alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca]
> Sent: Sunday, May 17, 2015 7:48 PM
> To: Milton L Mueller; Andrew Sullivan; cwg-stewardship at icann.org
> Subject: Re: [CWG-Stewardship] Fate of the .INT domain
> 
> Milton, I do appreciate the leadership role you are playing, but I note (from
> https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocwgdtstwrdshp/Design+Teams+List
> ):
> 
> Design Team H: .INT Operations
> 
> Lead: Elise Lindeberg
> 
> Status: Not Needed/Covered Elsewhere
> 
> Note: Priority 2 - Chairs understand that this issue is being dealt with by the
> GAC.
> 
> Alan
> 
> At 17/05/2015 06:12 PM, Milton L Mueller wrote:
> >Yes, Andrew to your credit you've been consistent about this. But I
> >have also been consistent in advocating that we fix whatever needs
> >fixing during this process. ;-)
> >
> >--MM
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > >
> > > Right, that's my point.  There is nothing wrong with a transition
> > > plan that says of int, "Status quo ante, nothing to see
> > here."  Which is I think what is
> > > being suggested.  That doesn't mean I think
> > it should never be changed, but I
> > > don't see why it needs to be linked to this, any more than I think
> > > SLA changes or other not strictly relevant operational adjustments
> > > ought to be included.
> > >
> >_______________________________________________
> >CWG-Stewardship mailing list
> >CWG-Stewardship at icann.org
> >https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship