[CWG-Stewardship] update on DT X Separation Process

[Gomes, Chuck]

What are you cringing at Olivier?  The separation review would be done by the IFRT with full community involvement.  The IFRT would not be led or controlled by registries; they would just have a significant role.  I will say it again:  the IFRT is M-S.

Chuck

From: Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond [mailto:ocl at gih.com]
Sent: Monday, May 18, 2015 10:44 AM
To: Gomes, Chuck; Seun Ojedeji
Cc: avri at acm.org; cwg-stewardship at icann.org
Subject: Re: [CWG-Stewardship] update on DT X Separation Process

Dear Chuck,
On 18/05/2015 14:29, Gomes, Chuck wrote:
I did not say that IFRT should be largely composed of ccTLD and gTLD registries.  I simply said that the IFRT composition should have stronger participation of ccTLD and gTLD registries than is proposed currently.  If the IFRT is doing a separation review, it is more important than ever for there to be strong direct customer participation.  I fully agree that IFRT must be M-S.

I cringe at this. If the decision for separation is to be decided by the IRFT then it will need to be accepted by all SOs & ACs & the group needs to be multistakeholder.
The CSC is already Registry-led, and quite rightly so. Separation does not solely affect direct customers. It is such a large step, it affects everyone.
Kindest regards,

Olivier
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20150518/e6b89aad/attachment-0001.html>