[CWG-Stewardship] Fate of the .INT domain

[Keith Davidson]

Surely we could recommend that ICANN divest itself of .int within a x 
year period after the transition?

I seem to recall there was a strong interest from the ITU in taking over 
.int at some point in the past, but has not re-emerged in anything I 
have seen for several years. I thought it might have been formally 
proposed by ITU during the NOI and FNOI stages of the NTIA / IANA 
renewal process. ITU made submissions, but the submissions did not refer 
to .int iirc.

Cheers

Keith

On 18/05/2015 10:10 a.m., Milton L Mueller wrote:
> I care. That's the kind of thing we should do - at least propose to ask them and initiate a process to change it if they want to.
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Do we have any idea of what the .int 2nd level registrants want?
>> Do we care?
>>
>> avri
>>
> _______________________________________________
> CWG-Stewardship mailing list
> CWG-Stewardship at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
> .
>