[CWG-Stewardship] For your review: public comment summary and review tool

[Milton L Mueller]

Grace,
Thanks, this is a good start and a helpful document. Nice and simple.
I would hope some quick improvements or emendations could be made before we start using it as a basis for discussion, however.

Slide 7 needs to separate the 32% "against" PTI into commenters who do not want IFO separated at all and those who want it more separated. They shouldn't be bundled together because they are pointing in opposite directions. Given the results shown on Slide 9 (insider vs. outsider board) it might make more sense to bundle those who want more separation into the "For" PTI category. Better yet, have 3 categories. And it would be good to see a breakdown of who you classified as "for" and "against-no separation" and "against-more separation" to verify these numbers. I counted only 2 or 3 who did not want it separated at all. I think we might have a green slide here.

On Slide 15, I am not sure it makes sense to classify comments about a lack of detail into "for" and "against." A comment that said there was not enough info about separation mechanisms is not necessarily "against" the proposed separation mechanism. I read all the comments and don't think I read a single one that was "against" a separation mechanism, most just recognized that this part of the CWG proposal was very sketchy. Which it was! So you could have another green slide here too if you reframed the question as: "does the separation mechanism need more work?"

Slide 14 highlights relevant input but seems a bit out of place at this stage, given the role of the ICG. While comments talking about the relationship between the 3 operational communities made some valid points, the primary task of CWG-stewardship is to define a solution for the names community. The other communities can then address its relationship to that solution and the ICG is then tasked with brokering compatibility adjustments.

--MM

From: cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org [mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Grace Abuhamad
Sent: Friday, May 22, 2015 2:34 PM
To: cwg-stewardship at icann.org
Cc: Brenda Brewer
Subject: [CWG-Stewardship] For your review: public comment summary and review tool

Dear all,

Staff has compiled a summary overview of the pubic comment submissions and filled out a public comment review tool, noting responses and specific action items for the CWG-Stewardship to consider. Please review these documents and suggest edits based on your assessment of the public comment submissions. The proposed actions for the CWG-Stewardship are highlighted in blue in the response column (far right).

The Public Comment Review Tool is very long and may be difficult to read. This is due to staff's approach in thorough and detailed review. We will provide a more digestible, action-focused, version of this tool for Tuesday's meeting. We are providing the long version to you today to demonstrate our work progress and preparation for next week's high-intensity meetings.

While the Public Comment Review Tool is very detailed, the summary overview is presented in a presentation format and focuses more on the "bigger picture". Depending on your review-style, you may be inclined to start with one or the other document.

Also, please note that these documents incorporate all (44) submissions received up until the deadline on 20 May at 23:59 UTC. As of 22 May at 16:00 UTC, there are (7) late submissions. These submissions have not yet been incorporated in this document but will be added in time for the high-intensity meetings (along with the submissions received based on the extension for those who are reliant on translations).

As a reminder, Brenda kindly pulled all the submissions together on the Wiki: https://community.icann.org/x/o5A0Aw. You can download all the files at once (like a zip file) by clicking on the "download all" button at the bottom left side of the macro.

Have a good (submission-reading-filled) weekend,
Grace
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20150522/50aa7f2b/attachment.html>