[CWG-Stewardship] For your review: public comment summary and review tool

[Gomes, Chuck]

That does help Bernie.  In other words, if an opinion wasn’t supported by at least 10% of the commenters, i.e., at least 4 commenters, it was included in the numbers for the trend presentation.

Chuck

From: Bernard Turcotte [mailto:turcotte.bernard at gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, May 22, 2015 3:41 PM
To: Gomes, Chuck
Cc: Grace Abuhamad; cwg-stewardship at icann.org; Brenda Brewer
Subject: Re: [CWG-Stewardship] For your review: public comment summary and review tool

Chuck,

Exactly what it says, if for a given category 10% or more of respondents stated an opinion for or against it was included.

Does this help?

B.

On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 3:37 PM, Gomes, Chuck <cgomes at verisign.com<mailto:cgomes at verisign.com>> wrote:
Thanks a lot to everyone on the staff team for doing this so quickly.

On  slide 4 of the presentation showing the major trends, what does the following statement mean: “Those categories representing more than 10% of responses are presented in this document.”?

Chuck

From: cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org<mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org> [mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org<mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org>] On Behalf Of Grace Abuhamad
Sent: Friday, May 22, 2015 2:34 PM
To: cwg-stewardship at icann.org<mailto:cwg-stewardship at icann.org>
Cc: Brenda Brewer
Subject: [CWG-Stewardship] For your review: public comment summary and review tool

Dear all,

Staff has compiled a summary overview of the pubic comment submissions and filled out a public comment review tool, noting responses and specific action items for the CWG-Stewardship to consider. Please review these documents and suggest edits based on your assessment of the public comment submissions. The proposed actions for the CWG-Stewardship are highlighted in blue in the response column (far right).

The Public Comment Review Tool is very long and may be difficult to read. This is due to staff’s approach in thorough and detailed review. We will provide a more digestible, action-focused, version of this tool for Tuesday’s meeting. We are providing the long version to you today to demonstrate our work progress and preparation for next week’s high-intensity meetings.

While the Public Comment Review Tool is very detailed, the summary overview is presented in a presentation format and focuses more on the “bigger picture”. Depending on your review-style, you may be inclined to start with one or the other document.

Also, please note that these documents incorporate all (44) submissions received up until the deadline on 20 May at 23:59 UTC. As of 22 May at 16:00 UTC, there are (7) late submissions. These submissions have not yet been incorporated in this document but will be added in time for the high-intensity meetings (along with the submissions received based on the extension for those who are reliant on translations).

As a reminder, Brenda kindly pulled all the submissions together on the Wiki: https://community.icann.org/x/o5A0Aw. You can download all the files at once (like a zip file) by clicking on the “download all” button at the bottom left side of the macro.

Have a good (submission-reading-filled) weekend,
Grace

_______________________________________________
CWG-Stewardship mailing list
CWG-Stewardship at icann.org<mailto:CWG-Stewardship at icann.org>
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20150522/e36893e6/attachment-0001.html>