[CWG-Stewardship] For your review: public comment summary and review tool

[Bernard Turcotte]

Correct.

B.

On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 4:37 PM, Gomes, Chuck <cgomes at verisign.com> wrote:

>  That does help Bernie.  In other words, if an opinion wasn’t supported
> by at least 10% of the commenters, i.e., at least 4 commenters, it was
> included in the numbers for the trend presentation.
>
>
>
> Chuck
>
>
>
> *From:* Bernard Turcotte [mailto:turcotte.bernard at gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Friday, May 22, 2015 3:41 PM
> *To:* Gomes, Chuck
> *Cc:* Grace Abuhamad; cwg-stewardship at icann.org; Brenda Brewer
> *Subject:* Re: [CWG-Stewardship] For your review: public comment summary
> and review tool
>
>
>
> Chuck,
>
>
>
> Exactly what it says, if for a given category 10% or more of respondents
> stated an opinion for or against it was included.
>
>
>
> Does this help?
>
>
>
> B.
>
>
>
> On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 3:37 PM, Gomes, Chuck <cgomes at verisign.com> wrote:
>
> Thanks a lot to everyone on the staff team for doing this so quickly.
>
>
>
> On  slide 4 of the presentation showing the major trends, what does the
> following statement mean: “Those categories representing more than 10% of
> responses are presented in this document.”?
>
>
>
> Chuck
>
>
>
> *From:* cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org [mailto:
> cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org] *On Behalf Of *Grace Abuhamad
> *Sent:* Friday, May 22, 2015 2:34 PM
> *To:* cwg-stewardship at icann.org
> *Cc:* Brenda Brewer
> *Subject:* [CWG-Stewardship] For your review: public comment summary and
> review tool
>
>
>
> Dear all,
>
>
>
> Staff has compiled a summary overview of the pubic comment submissions and
> filled out a public comment review tool, noting responses and specific
> action items for the CWG-Stewardship to consider. Please review these
> documents and suggest edits based on your assessment of the public comment
> submissions. The proposed actions for the CWG-Stewardship are highlighted
> in *blue* in the response column (far right).
>
>
>
> The Public Comment Review Tool is very long and may be difficult to read.
> This is due to staff’s approach in thorough and detailed review. *We will
> provide a more digestible, action-focused, version of this tool for
> Tuesday’s meeting. *We are providing the long version to you today to
> demonstrate our work progress and preparation for next week’s
> high-intensity meetings.
>
>
>
> While the Public Comment Review Tool is very detailed, the summary
> overview is presented in a presentation format and focuses more on the
> “bigger picture”. Depending on your review-style, you may be inclined to
> start with one or the other document.
>
>
>
> Also, please note that these documents incorporate all (44) submissions
> received up until the deadline on 20 May at 23:59 UTC. As of 22 May at
> 16:00 UTC, there are (7) late submissions. These submissions have not yet
> been incorporated in this document but will be added in time for the
> high-intensity meetings (along with the submissions received based on
> the extension for those who are reliant on translations).
>
>
>
> As a reminder, Brenda kindly pulled all the submissions together on the
> Wiki: https://community.icann.org/x/o5A0Aw. You can download all the
> files at once (like a zip file) by clicking on the “download all” button at
> the bottom left side of the macro.
>
>
>
> Have a good (submission-reading-filled) weekend,
>
> Grace
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CWG-Stewardship mailing list
> CWG-Stewardship at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20150522/5fdccd19/attachment.html>