[CWG-Stewardship] For your review: public comment summary and review tool

[Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond]

Thanks for the explanation, Bernie.

I do have a caveat about the method of calculation for the presentation
slides: they appear to take each response on a par level, thus a comment
from an Organisation or Government or an ICANN SO/AC appears to have the
same weight as a response from an individual. Granted, the majority of
comments were filed on behalf of organisations but I would be careful
about reading too much into the percentages that were calculated - and
am therefore concerned about having a cut-off at 10%. We are going to
need to read through the whole set of comments to have a better feeling
of the response from the community.
Kindest regards,

Olivier

On 22/05/2015 21:41, Bernard Turcotte wrote:
> Chuck,
>
> Exactly what it says, if for a given category 10% or more of
> respondents stated an opinion for or against it was included.
>
> Does this help?
>
> B.
>
> On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 3:37 PM, Gomes, Chuck <cgomes at verisign.com
> <mailto:cgomes at verisign.com>> wrote:
>
>     Thanks a lot to everyone on the staff team for doing this so
>     quickly. 
>
>      
>
>     On  slide 4 of the presentation showing the major trends, what
>     does the following statement mean: “Those categories representing
>     more than 10% of responses are presented in this document.”?
>
>      
>
>     Chuck
>
>      
>
>     *From:*cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org
>     <mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org>
>     [mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org
>     <mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org>] *On Behalf Of *Grace
>     Abuhamad
>     *Sent:* Friday, May 22, 2015 2:34 PM
>     *To:* cwg-stewardship at icann.org <mailto:cwg-stewardship at icann.org>
>     *Cc:* Brenda Brewer
>     *Subject:* [CWG-Stewardship] For your review: public comment
>     summary and review tool
>
>      
>
>     Dear all, 
>
>      
>
>     Staff has compiled a summary overview of the pubic comment
>     submissions and filled out a public comment review tool, noting
>     responses and specific action items for the CWG-Stewardship to
>     consider. Please review these documents and suggest edits based on
>     your assessment of the public comment submissions. The proposed
>     actions for the CWG-Stewardship are highlighted in */blue/* in the
>     response column (far right).  
>
>      
>
>     The Public Comment Review Tool is very long and may be difficult
>     to read. This is due to staff’s approach in thorough and detailed
>     review. *We will provide a more digestible, action-focused,
>     version of this tool for Tuesday’s meeting. *We are providing the
>     long version to you today to demonstrate our work progress and
>     preparation for next week’s high-intensity meetings. 
>
>      
>
>     While the Public Comment Review Tool is very detailed, the summary
>     overview is presented in a presentation format and focuses more on
>     the “bigger picture”. Depending on your review-style, you may be
>     inclined to start with one or the other document. 
>
>      
>
>     Also, please note that these documents incorporate all (44)
>     submissions received up until the deadline on 20 May at 23:59
>     UTC. As of 22 May at 16:00 UTC, there are (7) late submissions.
>     These submissions have not yet been incorporated in this document
>     but will be added in time for the high-intensity meetings (along
>     with the submissions received based on the extension for those who
>     are reliant on translations). 
>
>      
>
>     As a reminder, Brenda kindly pulled all the submissions together
>     on the Wiki: https://community.icann.org/x/o5A0Aw. You can
>     download all the files at once (like a zip file) by clicking on
>     the “download all” button at the bottom left side of the macro. 
>
>      
>
>     Have a good (submission-reading-filled) weekend, 
>
>     Grace
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     CWG-Stewardship mailing list
>     CWG-Stewardship at icann.org <mailto:CWG-Stewardship at icann.org>
>     https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CWG-Stewardship mailing list
> CWG-Stewardship at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20150525/a6e20919/attachment.html>