[CWG-Stewardship] Initial DT-N Response to Major Comment Areas

[Milton L Mueller]

I find the statement about "Separation Costs" below to be very strange. If there is a separation process and it results in separation, PTI is "fired" and no one covers its expenses. It goes out of business. ICANN contracts with someone else. For that reason, I agree in principle with RySG concept of earmarked or set-side funds for the IFO regardless of who it is. Stephanie, is there something about this statement I did not understand correctly?



Separation Costs: Some comments dealt with concerns about how IANA expenses would be covered following a separation process. DT-N supports this recommendation. We look to the full CWG for a determination on where this issue is best resolved (DT N, DT L, DT O or full CWG).




-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20150529/b1b9e22d/attachment.html>