[CWG-Stewardship] Initial DT-N Response to Major Comment Areas

[Duchesneau, Stephanie]

Hi Milton,

I agree with the RySG approach too of earmarking fees regardless of who the IFO is.

The DT-N comment simply was that this matter needs to be handled within the CWG’s work, without speaking to how. I am not sure that DT-N/X/SR is the right place which is why I deferred to the CWG or potentially a different DT in the comment.

Stephanie

Stephanie Duchesneau
Neustar, Inc. / Public Policy Manager
1775 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, 4th Floor, Washington, DC 20006
Office: +1.202.533.2623 Mobile: +1.703.731.2040  Fax: +1.202.533.2623 / www.neustar.biz<http://www.neustar.biz/>

From: <Gomes>, Chuck <cgomes at verisign.com<mailto:cgomes at verisign.com>>
Date: Friday, May 29, 2015 at 10:15 AM
To: Milton L Mueller <mueller at syr.edu<mailto:mueller at syr.edu>>, "Duchesneau, Stephanie" <Stephanie.Duchesneau at neustar.us<mailto:Stephanie.Duchesneau at neustar.us>>, "cwg-stewardship at icann.org<mailto:cwg-stewardship at icann.org>" <cwg-stewardship at icann.org<mailto:cwg-stewardship at icann.org>>
Cc: "avri at acm.org<mailto:avri at acm.org>" <avri at acm.org<mailto:avri at acm.org>>
Subject: RE: Initial DT-N Response to Major Comment Areas

I am not Stephanie as you know, but I think you got it right Milton.

Chuck

From: Milton L Mueller [mailto:mueller at syr.edu]
Sent: Friday, May 29, 2015 10:08 AM
To: Gomes, Chuck; Duchesneau, Stephanie; cwg-stewardship at icann.org<mailto:cwg-stewardship at icann.org>
Cc: avri at acm.org<mailto:avri at acm.org>
Subject: RE: Initial DT-N Response to Major Comment Areas

I find the statement about “Separation Costs” below to be very strange. If there is a separation process and it results in separation, PTI is “fired” and no one covers its expenses. It goes out of business. ICANN contracts with someone else. For that reason, I agree in principle with RySG concept of earmarked or set-side funds for the IFO regardless of who it is. Stephanie, is there something about this statement I did not understand correctly?



Separation Costs: Some comments dealt with concerns about how IANA expenses would be covered following a separation process. DT-N supports this recommendation. We look to the full CWG for a determination on where this issue is best resolved (DT N, DT L, DT O or full CWG).




-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20150529/d3bcdb5c/attachment-0001.html>