[CWG-Stewardship] Notes, Recordings, Transcript CWG IANA #55 - 29 May (Session 6)
Brenda Brewer
brenda.brewer at icann.org
Fri May 29 16:07:00 UTC 2015
Dear all,
The notes, recordings and transcripts for the CWG IANA High Intensity Meeting, Session 6 - 29 May
are available here: https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocwgdtstwrdshp/IANA+CWG+Meeting+%2355
Kind regards,
Brenda
Action Items
Action: DTs aim to finalize responses to PC and documents/edits to draft proposal by Monday 1 June
at 12:00 UTC
Action: Staff to provide updated draft for sections iv, v, vi in draft to be circulated for
Tuesday's call (2 June)
Notes
Overall Timeline / Milestones
* 2 June CWG-Stewardship meeting
* 4 June CWG-Stewardship meeting - review final proposal (sign-off?)
* 8 June - submission to SO/ACs
* 9 June CWG-Stewardship meeting - Next steps, communication, other issues
* W/C 8 June - Communication Work - Webinars on 11 June?
* 21-25 June -- ICANN 53 in Buenos Aires
Notes:
Eduardo Diaz on audio only
1. Recap & Continuation of Prior Meeting
* Worked with outputs from DT-N and DT-SR/X
IFRT
* Agreement to add ccNSO member to IFRT
* Alternates -- 2 options: members could each have alternates (doubling the size) OR member
could name alternates in case of substitution
* These groups are open and transparent processes so anyone can observe proceedings
* Clarification: No additional gTLD representation
S[C]WG
* Geographic diversity where possible
* Skillset recommendations
* Expansion proposition: 3 gTLD registries & 3 ccTLD registries (one additional ccTLD
registry and one additional gTLD registry). The registries must ensure georgraphic diversity.
* This group is also open and transparent so anyone can observe proceedings
* Recognising that at the time the SWG will be invoked this will be at the end of a
substantial process. As such, the SWG is expected to move will be required to move forward with
expediency and due diligence.
Separation Costs
* Transition costs and ongoing operation costs
* Sufficient portion of registry fees would be dedicated to the IANA services which would
carry over should there be to the new operator should there be a separation, but this should not
result in an increase in fees. May need to be evaluated periodically to assess whether there have
been changes in budget.
* ICANN maintains responsibility for funding of the IANA functions services whether in house
or not (for any future state of the IANA functions)
Key points on Separation Costs
* 1. in the event of a future transition, ICANN would fund transition
* 2. ICANN is responsible for ongoing funding of IANA operation & services
* 3. no raise in fees directly associated with that
2. Design Teams
Action: DTs aim to finalize responses to PC and documents/edits to draft proposal by Monday 1 June
at 12:00 UTC
3. Outstanding Sections
Action: Staff to provide updated draft for sections iv, v, vi in draft to be circulated for
Tuesday's call (2 June)
4. Client Committee
* Client Committee to ask Sidley to assist CWG with assuring condionality with
CCWG-Accountability proposal
* For ICANN 53 in BA, Holly will cover CCWG Accountability and may not be able to fully cover
both groups, so request for Sharon Flanagan attendance as well.
* Assistance with Bylaws -- making sure changes are clear and known
* Punch List reviewed and checked for completeness (CWG staff to compile first)
5. Term Sheet
* Term Sheet is available here:
<https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/52891634/Term%20Sheet%20-%20ICANN_PTI%20Contract%2
0.docx?version=1&modificationDate=1432138454000&api=v2>
https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/52891634/Term%20Sheet%20-%20ICANN_PTI%20Contract%20
.docx?version=1&modificationDate=1432138454000&api=v2
* The Term Sheet is a draft set of terms that will be implemented in the ICANN-PTI Contract
(foundation on which the contract could be based)
* Comments on Term Sheet due on Monday June 1 at 23:59 UTC
6. CCWG-Accountability Public Comment
* Coordination between groups
* We received comments from the CCWG Chairs and CWG Chairs plan to respond to their public
comment as well by 3 June
7. Sign off on Final Proposal
* Draft Final on Tuesday 2 June
* 2nd reading and sign off on Thursday 4 June
* No vote (preferred) -- instead a process of non-objection
* If there are objections to signing off, we should seek explanations (and where possible try
to remedy them)
* Distinguish between SO/AC approval and CWG approval
8. AOB: James Gannon [GNSO-NCSG]: Need to discuss delivery of a draft timeline for implementation to
ICG at some stage today if possible.
* Part of Section IV -- work in progress
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20150529/4095c492/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.gif
Type: image/gif
Size: 92 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20150529/4095c492/image001-0001.gif>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 5035 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20150529/4095c492/smime-0001.p7s>
More information about the CWG-Stewardship
mailing list