[CWG-Stewardship] registry fees & IANA costs was Re: [] Initial ...

[Avri Doria]

Hi,

On 29-May-15 12:43, Gomes, Chuck wrote:
> While I do not agree that it would be out of scope, let me put that aside and ask you a question Avri:  How would you propose addressing the registry concern about the possibility of registry fees (which of course would likely be paid by registrars and ultimately registrants) be raised to cover IANA costs that are presently paid mostly via registry/registrar/registrant fees?

As part of the ICANN Budget cycle process?

Not a process I take part in, but one that I assume deals with issues
such as how ICANN income and outgo are allocated.  Seems like a really
good exercise that I would watch with interest.  I just do not see this
topic as part of the IANA Stewardship Transition process, which should
be satisfied with a commitment  that ICANN will pay IANA's way as needed
and negotiated through transitions and beyond.  It is the price of ICANN
holding stewardship.  As between parent and ward.

The CCWG is working on the mechanisms needed to deal with ICANN budget
issues going forward, these ICANN budget allocation issues do not need
to lumped in with the transition itself.


avri


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
http://www.avast.com