[CWG-Stewardship] Volume 11: An Update on IANA Stewardship Discussions

Tue Nov 3 15:48:30 UTC 2015

That is my understanding as well.

Greg

On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 10:16 AM, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond <ocl at gih.com>
wrote:

> Hello all,
>
> my immediate reaction is that if the ICG has given up the responsibility
> of the oversight role in the implementations, this prompts each operational
> community to perform this oversight and this translates to CWG Stewardship
> having oversight of the implementation of our recommendations.
> Kindest regards,
>
> Olivier
>
>
> On 03/11/2015 14:46, Gomes, Chuck wrote:
>
> In looking at what I think is the latest version of the Action Item
> Inventory, it looks like the ICG no longer is listed as the responsible
> party for implementation of any of the Names action items but I do note
> that in the oversight responsibility is shown as TBD for all of the Names
> action items.  At what point do we need to decide who has the oversight
> responsibility?
>
>
>
> Chuck
>
>
>
> *From:* cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org [
> mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org
> <cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org>] *On Behalf Of *Gomes, Chuck
> *Sent:* Tuesday, November 03, 2015 8:26 AM
> *To:* Grace Abuhamad; cwg-stewardship at icann.org
> *Subject:* Re: [CWG-Stewardship] Volume 11: An Update on IANA Stewardship
> Discussions
>
>
>
> Thanks Grace.  Based on the ICG decisions in Dublin, it appears that they
> will not be performing an oversight role of the implementation of the CWG
> Stewardship recommendations.  I think that means that we may need to update
> our implementation action item spreadsheet to remove the ICG as one of the
> responsible parties for certain action items.  I also think that the CWG
> may then be the responsible party in places where we listed the ICG.
>
>
>
> Chuck
>
>
>
> *From:* cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org [
> mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org
> <cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org>] *On Behalf Of *Grace Abuhamad
> *Sent:* Tuesday, November 03, 2015 12:31 AM
> *To:* cwg-stewardship at icann.org
> *Subject:* [CWG-Stewardship] Volume 11: An Update on IANA Stewardship
> Discussions
>
>
>
> Original link:
> https://www.icann.org/news/blog/volume-11-an-update-on-iana-stewardship-discussions
>
>
> Volume 11: An Update on IANA Stewardship Discussions
> Following ICANN54, the IANA Stewardship Transition is now a step closer
>
> The ICG and CCWG-Accountability met in Dublin during ICANN54
> <https://meetings.icann.org/en/dublin54> to continue work on their
> proposals in wake of the feedback received during the two public comment
> periods that ended in September. The ICG was successful in completing its
> Consolidated IANA Stewardship Proposal and is now awaiting the finalization
> of the CCWG-Accountability’s Work Stream 1 Recommendations. When
> CCWG-Accountability finalizes its Work Stream 1 recommendations, and the
> CWG-Stewardship confirms that the recommendations meet its requirements,
> the ICGcan consider its proposal complete and begin the process of
> submitting it to the NTIA.
> Consolidated IANA Stewardship Proposal
>
> Taking into account an analysis of the public comments
> <https://www.dropbox.com/s/j07zo4malyc2sx6/Public%20Comment%20Summary%20-%2023Oct15-f2f%20edits-clean.docx?dl=0> received
> during the public comment period
> <https://www.ianacg.org/calls-for-input/combined-proposal-public-comment-period/> that
> ended on 8 September 2015, and after a number of working sessions
> <https://meetings.icann.org/en/dublin54/schedule-table?combine=ICG> during
> ICANN54 <https://meetings.icann.org/en/dublin54> in Dublin,
> the IANA Stewardship Transition Coordination Group (ICG
> <http://www.ianacg.org/>) has announced
> <https://www.ianacg.org/icg-completes-its-work-and-awaits-conclusion-of-ccwg-on-enhancing-icann-accountability/>that
> it has finalized its proposal
> <http://www.ianacg.org/icg-files/documents/IANA-transition-proposal-v9.pdf>.
> However, before the ICG sends the proposal to the National
> Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA
> <http://www.ntia.doc.gov/>) via the ICANN Board, it will first confirm
> with the Cross Community Working Group to Develop an IANA Stewardship
> Transition Proposal on Naming Related Functions (CWG-Stewardship
> <https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocwgdtstwrdshp/CWG+to+Develop+an+IANA+Stewardship+Transition+Proposal+on+Naming+Related+Functions>)
> that its accountability requirements have been met by Work Stream 1
> recommendations currently being finalized by the Cross Community Working
> Group on Enhancing ICANN Accountability (CCWG-Accountability
> <https://community.icann.org/display/acctcrosscomm/CCWG+on+Enhancing+ICANN+Accountability>).TheICG has
> decided to keep its mailing lists active until 30 September 2016 to enable
> the community to continue to contact them, if needed. It is also seeking
> feedback from the threeIANA operational communities (names, numbers and
> protocol parameters) to see if they would like ICG to play a role during
> the implementation of the IANA Stewardship Transition. The ICGwill not hold
> any more face-to-face meetings and will only hold conference calls on an
> as-needed basis.
>
> There are still some implementation details to be finalized for the
> transition, including the issue of the IANA trademark and intellectual
> property rights (IPR). The CWG-Stewardship will work with the two other
> operational communities to find a solution to the IPR issue that meets the
> needs of all three communities.
> CCWG-Accountability Work Stream 1 Recommendations
>
> Following the 12 September end of the public comment period
> <https://www.icann.org/public-comments/ccwg-accountability-2015-08-03-en> for
> the 2nd Draft Proposal on Work Stream 1 Recommendations
> <https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/ccwg-draft-2-proposal-work-stream-1-recs-03aug15-en.pdf>,
> the CCWG-Accountability held a face-to-face meeting
> <https://www.icann.org/public-comments/ccwg-accountability-2015-08-03-en>,
> 25-26 September, in Los Angeles, and a number of working sessions
> <https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=56134263> in
> Dublin during ICANN54. As a result of its work to incorporate the feedback
> from the community, including feedback from the ICANN Board, the
> CCWG-Accountability made a number of adjustments and refinements to its
> draft recommendations. As a result of the adjustments, the
> CCWG-Accountability has decided to send the revised recommendations for a
> third public comment period.
>
> The third comment period will have a two-stage approach so the community
> can begin reviewing the materials as soon as possible. This is to enable
> the report on Work Stream 1 recommendations to be finalized and sent to
> the ICANN Board by mid January 2016, ensuring there are minimal effects on
> the timeline of the IANA Stewardship Transition.
> Key dates
>
> *15 Nov 2015*
>
> A high-level overview of Work Stream 1 Recommendations and a summary of
> changes from the 2nd Draft Proposal to be:
>
> 1.      Released for a 35-day public comment period
>
> 2.      Sent to the CCWG-Accountability’s Chartering Organizations for
> their feedback
>
> *30 Nov 2015*
>
> Full third draft report on Work Stream 1 Recommendations released for 20
> days of consultation
>
> *Early Jan 2016*
>
> Amended report submitted to Chartering Organizations
>
> *Mid Jan 2016*
>
> Potential face-to-face meeting for Chartering Organizations, if needed, to
> decide whether to support the report
>
> *Mid Jan 2016*
>
> CCWG-Accountability to submit final report to the ICANN Board, enabling
> theICG to also submit its final report
>
> For more information on the amendments that the CCWG-Accountability
> decided to pursue in Dublin, see the Cross Community Working Group on
> Enhancing ICANN Accountability ICANN54 co-Chairs' Statement
> <https://www.icann.org/news/blog/Cross%20Community%20Working%20Group%20on%20Enhancing%20ICANN%20Accountability%20ICANN54%20co-Chairs%27%20Statement>
> .
> IANA Stewardship Transition in the news
>
> 27 Oct 2015
>
> Governments v. ICANN: The Last Battle Before the IANA Transition
> <http://blogs.cfr.org/cyber/2015/10/27/governments-v-icann-the-last-battle-before-the-iana-transition/>,
> Council on Foreign Relations [EN]
>
> 23 Oct 2015
>
> ICANN and IANA: Making the right – not a rash – decision
> <https://www.aei.org/publication/icann-and-iana-making-the-right-not-a-rash-decision/>,
> American Enterprise Institute [EN]
>
> 13 Oct 2015
>
> Perché 40 mila ore di lavoro non sono bastate a trovare un accordo sul
> futuro di Internet senza la guida USA
> <http://www.chefuturo.it/2015/10/accordo-futuro-internet-usa/>,
> CheFuturo! [IT]
>
> 29 Sep 2015
>
> IANA-Aufgabe durch USA weiter unter Zeitdruck: Auf Messers Schneide
> <http://www.heise.de/netze/meldung/IANA-Aufgabe-durch-USA-weiter-unter-Zeitdruck-Auf-Messers-Schneide-2832298.html>,
> Heise [DE]
> You can play a role in IANA’s future…
>
> *Anyone can participate in discussions about the future of IANA's
> stewardship and ICANNaccountability. For information on joining *
> *CCWG-Accountability**, contact * <accountability-staff at icann.org>*accountability-staff at icann.org
> <accountability-staff at icann.org>**.*
>
> *Compiled on behalf of ICANN by Samantha Dickinson | 2 November 2015*
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CWG-Stewardship mailing listCWG-Stewardship at icann.orghttps://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CWG-Stewardship mailing list
> CWG-Stewardship at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20151103/4716fcda/attachment-0001.html>