[CWG-Stewardship] CWG response on .ARPA (Fwd: Re: [NRO-IANAXFER] Questions from the ICG)
Andrew Sullivan
ajs at anvilwalrusden.com
Thu Oct 8 13:20:56 UTC 2015
On Thu, Oct 08, 2015 at 07:37:27AM +0100, Seun Ojedeji wrote:
> Some time ago, I was saying that responding to the ICG question related to
> .ARPA in the manner we did may not be appropriate. Below is a draft
> response of CRISP that clearly prefers that it's related .ARPA strings be
> immune of CSC/IFR processes.
The CRISP proposal is not about ARPA but about IN-ADDR.ARPA and
IP6.ARPA. Those are different zones.
Best regards,
A
--
Andrew Sullivan
ajs at anvilwalrusden.com
More information about the CWG-Stewardship
mailing list