[CWG-Stewardship] FW: [client com] CWG Comment Letter

[Greg Shatan]

It was my understanding that the IANA budget would also embrace
IANA-related expenses (and revenues?) that were not incurred (received?) by
PTI.

Greg

On Sun, Sep 13, 2015 at 10:34 AM, Gomes, Chuck <cgomes at verisign.com> wrote:

> Jonathan,
>
>
>
> Like I said, it is not a big deal.  It just seemed to me that the IANA
> budget and PTI budget are essentially the same thing under our proposal so
> I was just curious as to why the edit was made.
>
>
>
> Chuck
>
>
>
> *From:* Jonathan Robinson [mailto:jrobinson at afilias.info]
> *Sent:* Saturday, September 12, 2015 9:59 AM
> *To:* Gomes, Chuck; cwg-stewardship at icann.org
> *Cc:* 'Thomas Rickert'
>
> *Subject:* RE: [CWG-Stewardship] FW: [client com] CWG Comment Letter
>
>
>
> Chuck,
>
>
>
> I am not sure I recall the motivation (if it was discussed at all) for
> this change. The way I read it, is that the IANA Budget review is by
> definition also or in effect a PTI budget review and therefore it’s not
> necessary to say both.
>
>
>
> I suggest we submit the comment as currently drafted and then, if for any
> reason we wish to re-introduce this “/PTI budget” component, we submit it
> as a minor revision.
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
> Jonathan
>
>
>
> *From:* Gomes, Chuck [mailto:cgomes at verisign.com <cgomes at verisign.com>]
> *Sent:* 11 September 2015 17:30
> *To:* jrobinson at afilias.info; cwg-stewardship at icann.org
> *Cc:* Thomas Rickert <thomas at rickert.net>
> *Subject:* RE: [CWG-Stewardship] FW: [client com] CWG Comment Letter
>
>
>
> I like the edits made and thank Sidley for doing this.  I do have one
> minor question: under item 1, why was PTI deleted in this sentence: “It
> is anticipated that the IANA/PTI budget Budget review will include a
>
> consultation process with IANA customers.”?  Like I said, this is not a
> big issue.
>
>
>
> Chuck
>
>
>
> *From:* cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org [
> mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org
> <cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org>] *On Behalf Of *Jonathan Robinson
> *Sent:* Friday, September 11, 2015 7:20 AM
> *To:* cwg-stewardship at icann.org
> *Cc:* Thomas Rickert
> *Subject:* [CWG-Stewardship] FW: [client com] CWG Comment Letter
>
>
>
> All,
>
>
>
> Please see attached from Sidley. This addresses the feedback and
> discussion from the CWG call yesterday.
>
>
>
> Lise and I have discussed this version and we are satisfied that we can
> submit this to the CCWG public comment as is.
>
>
>
> However, as discussed yesterday, we will wait 24 hours (until 12h00 UTC,
> Saturday 12 September) before doing so.
>
>
>
> If you do have additional comment or input, please do provide ASAP,
> ideally by 23h59 UTC today (Friday 11 Sep) and, in any event, no later than
> 12h00 UTC tomorrow (12 Sep).
>
>
>
> Thank-you,
>
>
>
>
>
> Jonathan & Lise
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Flanagan, Sharon [mailto:sflanagan at sidley.com
> <sflanagan at sidley.com>]
> *Sent:* 11 September 2015 04:02
> *To:* Client Committee <cwg-client at icann.org>
> *Subject:* [client com] CWG Comment Letter
>
>
>
> Dear Client Committee,
>
>
>
> Attached is a revised draft of the comment letter which reflects the
> discussion today, along with a few clean up edits.  We’ve attached a clean
> copy and a redline against the Tuesday draft.
>
>
>
> Best regards,
>
> Holly and Sharon
>
>
>
> *SHARON* *FLANAGAN*
> Partner
>
> Sidley Austin LLP
> 555 California Street
> Suite 2000
> San Francisco, CA 94104
> +1 415 772 1271
> sflanagan at sidley.com
> www.sidley.com
>
> [image: http://www.sidley.com/files/upload/signatures/SA-autosig.png]
> <http://www.sidley.com/> *SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP*
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ****************************************************************************************************
> This e-mail is sent by a law firm and may contain information that is
> privileged or confidential.
> If you are not the intended recipient, please delete the e-mail and any
> attachments and notify us
> immediately.
>
>
> ****************************************************************************************************
>
> _______________________________________________
> CWG-Stewardship mailing list
> CWG-Stewardship at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20150913/564be8d0/attachment-0001.html>