[CWG-Stewardship] For your review - CWG Implementation Action items document

[Gomes, Chuck]

Thanks for the quick feedback Olivier.  I will leave it to others to respond to your third point but I do add some responses to your first two below.

Chuck

From: cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org [mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond
Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 2015 1:03 PM
To: cwg-stewardship at icann.org
Subject: Re: [CWG-Stewardship] For your review - CWG Implementation Action items document

Hello all,

thanks for forwarding this excellent piece of work. Very thorough indeed.

Just a few notes:

1. There are many Action points to be undertaken by the CWG and ICANN, but many take place under the oversight of ICG. (with a question mark) As many of the processes are internal ICANN processes, I doubt that the ICG will want to engage in their supervision. It might be interesting to have a column that shows whether the action item itself requires intervention or involvement from any of the other operational communities.
[Chuck Gomes] The reason that a question mark was inserted each time the ICG was named as an oversight body is because we really do not know what their role will be or, as you ask, will they have any at all.  Clearly that is not a decision for us to make.  Because the creation of this inventory was in response to a request from the ICG, the columns correspond to what they asked for.  I don't think that would prevent us from adding another column but we might want to ask them if that would be useful to them.

2. Action Item #6 and #7 relate to the relationship with Verisign. Is it anticipated that Verisign will continue its contract with ICANN or will it contract with PTI? It might not be just a case of amending contracts to remove NTIA from the equation.
[Chuck Gomes] As far as creating this inventory goes, I don't think we were anticipating anything particular about the Verisign relationship.  Items #6 & #7 simply identify very generic action items that are required.  They intentionally do not describe how they would be implemented.

3. Action Item #12 establishing the IANA Functions Review (IFR) is shown as being needed 2 years after transition. Should we show "or earlier if a Special IANA Functions Review is needed"?

Kindest regards,

Olivier

On 29/09/2015 16:24, Marika Konings wrote:
Apologies, it looks like the attachment has not come through correctly. Here it is again.

Best regards,

Marika

From: <cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org<mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org>> on behalf of Marika Konings <marika.konings at icann.org<mailto:marika.konings at icann.org>>
Date: Tuesday 29 September 2015 08:20
To: "cwg-stewardship at icann.org<mailto:cwg-stewardship at icann.org>" <cwg-stewardship at icann.org<mailto:cwg-stewardship at icann.org>>
Subject: [CWG-Stewardship] For your review - CWG Implementation Action items document

Dear All,

In relation to agenda item 3, please find attached a first draft of the CWG-Stewardship Implementation Inventory for your review and input. As you may recall, Chuck Gomes volunteered during the last meeting to provide an implementation list based on the CWG-Stewardship proposal. Following that meeting, the ICG reached out to the CWG-Stewardship Chairs with the request to provide input on the implementation action items / schedule, ideally by mid-week this week, following which this document was developed by Chuck. The CWG-Stewardship Chairs will reach out to the ICG to inform them that the CWG-Stewardship will review this topic during its meeting on Thursday and as such some additional time may be needed before a formal response can be provided.

Please review this document ahead of Thursday's meeting and share any comments / edits you may have with the mailing list.

Best regards,

Marika

From: <cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org<mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org>> on behalf of Marika Konings <marika.konings at icann.org<mailto:marika.konings at icann.org>>
Date: Tuesday 29 September 2015 07:39
To: "cwg-stewardship at icann.org<mailto:cwg-stewardship at icann.org>" <cwg-stewardship at icann.org<mailto:cwg-stewardship at icann.org>>
Subject: [CWG-Stewardship] Proposed Agenda - CWG-Stewardship Meeting Thursday 1 October

Dear All,

Please find below the proposed agenda for Thursday's CWG-Stewardship meeting (scheduled for 11.00 UTC). Supporting documents for the different items will be circulated in separate emails to facilitate feedback via the mailing list.

Best regards,

Marika

Proposed Agenda for CWG-Stewardship Meeting on Thursday 1 October

  1.  Opening Remarks
  2.  ICG Questions - review of draft responses
  3.  Implementation Schedule
  4.  Update from CCWG-Accountability
  5.  Update on legal work
  6.  AoB




_______________________________________________

CWG-Stewardship mailing list

CWG-Stewardship at icann.org<mailto:CWG-Stewardship at icann.org>

https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship



--

Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond, PhD

http://www.gih.com/ocl.html
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20150929/702c897e/attachment-0001.html>