[CWG-Stewardship] For your review - draft responses to ICG Questions
Alan Greenberg
alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca
Tue Sep 29 18:59:34 UTC 2015
Regarding the first item on the Verisign/ICANN proposal:
To quote from an analysis I did for the ALAC Transition Support group:
>The document is an implementation of the implied recommendation of
>Design Team F that nothing be changed in the RZMS code prior to or
>during transition. It follows the golden rule that you should make
>as few changes at the same time as possible.
>
>In my mind, this proposal carried that rule to a ridiculous extreme.
The proposal calls for an lot of work and expense to avoid making a
relatively simple coding change that could be verified seventeen ways
to Sunday. But yes, it does meeting the CWG requirements.
Alan
At 29/09/2015 09:57 AM, Marika Konings wrote:
>Dear All,
>
>In order to facilitate the development of responses to the ICG
>Questions, staff has, in co-ordination with the chairs, prepared the
>attached table which provides a draft response for a number of the
>ICG questions which is intended to serve as a starting point for
>CWG-Stewardship deliberations. Please review this document and share
>your feedback with the mailing list, if possible, prior to the
>CWG-Stewardship meeting on Thursday.
>
>Thanks,
>
>Marika
>
>_______________________________________________
>CWG-Stewardship mailing list
>CWG-Stewardship at icann.org
>https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
More information about the CWG-Stewardship
mailing list