[CWG-Stewardship] For your review - draft responses to ICG Questions
Jaap Akkerhuis
jaap at NLnetLabs.nl
Wed Sep 30 11:55:05 UTC 2015
Alan Greenberg writes:
> Regarding the first item on the Verisign/ICANN proposal:
>
> To quote from an analysis I did for the ALAC Transition Support group:
>
> >The document is an implementation of the implied recommendation of
> >Design Team F that nothing be changed in the RZMS code prior to or
> >during transition. It follows the golden rule that you should make
> >as few changes at the same time as possible.
> >
> >In my mind, this proposal carried that rule to a ridiculous extreme.
>
> The proposal calls for an lot of work and expense to avoid making a
> relatively simple coding change that could be verified seventeen ways
> to Sunday. But yes, it does meeting the CWG requirements.
Agreed, it is just a proposal for testing the communication lines.
jaap
More information about the CWG-Stewardship
mailing list